@freeschool

Hello @freemo ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ™‹โ€โ™‚๏ธ

I read through your above post and have some suggestions iF you are interested in adding to your list & discussion. Since the algorithm here is FIFO and also on the client side ( people / servers / scripts see your post and respond in kind with similar keywords & subjects ) who you follow and interact with matters. Most are real people but some are bots so keep that in mind.

Have you tried the three feeds under the ๐ŸŒ icon? Browsing that is one way to get exposed to people you don't follow already but you probably already know that based on your post above, yes?

If you are interested in following news here is a nice list to start with that is also actively being updated with global and local news sources:

๐Ÿ“ฐ๐Ÿ—ž๏ธ
๐Ÿ‘‡
https://infosec.exchange/@infosec_jcp/111438985887720134

You also mentioned a few things about data scraping and your current server admin not wanting to add or adopt an anti-data scraping / anti-LLM language. Not all servers are pro-LLM. Some servers have policies about that already such as where I am hosted on server wise here :

โ›” LLM / AI Data Scraping ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿšซ
https://infosec.eXchange/about

You could adopt your own #UserPrivacyPolicy also, for free, so feel free to copy it and link in your profile to have your own Privacy Policy. Mine is specifically about commercial LLM's and to not use my data / posts for commercial LLM's as input. I also have this same policy for myself linked on Twitter. You could change the language if you want to also include noncommercial LLMs if you want:

โ›” LLM / AI Data Scraping ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿšซ #UserPrivacyPolicy example

https://infosec.exchange/@infosec_jcp/111008351195769160

Have you talked to some #fediverse server admins about their experience here on the fediverse vs. the Oligarch Controlled web hosting platforms? One thing that _constantly_ comes up as a comparison is moderation practices which are different per server vs. the Oligarch Web Hosting ones in the way they are run. Having control of the moderation policy for your own system, like in the BBS Bulletin Board & USENET days, is important and can be set by your admin and moderators by their moderation policy on their server. This is usually called out and linked to in the https:// server-url-example . tld / about page.

One thing of note though about ' what you think is wrong per group ' though is perhaps the way those group dynamics are playing out is how that group interacts, perhaps. Not all interactions observed by someone not in said group ' is something going wrong ' so maybe what is happening is what that group is interested in which could be a misunderstanding perhaps? Observe for longer and engage with the group could be an age / culture / interest / local / regional / national / cultural / tradition thing where you may or may not know about a specific thing that could seem negative but in that specific group could be an ' in joke ' or ' sh!tpost ' type meme situation, perhaps.

You mentioned also about in your CW, how you think ' Trust in Fediverse seems is fading ' but I didn't see in your post where you mentioned this anywhere? One thing to note about the fediverse architecture is that it has a pro-user filters where you can create your own keyword block lists, URL blocks, etc. Have you explored that area at all? There is a history of creating a better run per server per user experience culture so that when harassment by a specific user or group of users can be delt with by the user as well as by the server admin who both have powerful blocking tools at their account level to by user or by server block that type interaction or mute them. There is a good history of this on the fediverse being pro-user control of their interactions as a good feature built in.

You also said that ' AND not being built on as relationships / networks etc ' which seems incorrect since you listed a TON of groups with similar interests who interact together. So who you follow, like other social networks, depends on your own choices of who you follow.

Keywords and hashtags ( searchable using the compass ๐Ÿงญ icon ) are a great way to discover new topics and also new people with shared interest in specific keywords. Each server also has a small graph showing keyword trends and there is also a news links feature that the server shows based on link frequency of the link shared which is quite handy!

Some helpful ' tracking growth on the fediverse accounts ' found include:

ยน Fediverse PeerTube Tracker, a YouTube like video sharing instance competitor:
https://libera.site/channel/peertube

ยฒ PixelFed, an Instagram competitor
https://mastodon.social/@pixelfed

ยณ Misskey,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misskey

โด Trending Hashtags Bot:
https://mastodon.social/@trendytoots

โต FediTips, tips on how to better use the fediverse
https://social.growyourown.services/@FediTips

โถ Various Fediverse Server Observation / Statistics / Growth / Statistics Bots that monitor the ecosystem / links:

https://libera.site/channel/mastodon

https://mastodon.social/@fediversereport

https://mastodont.cat/@fediverse

https://libera.site/channel/misskey

Great info in your bio. Love the links & examples and pro education evangelization ! ๐Ÿ‘ I'll keep adding to the list as , like you, only have a specific amount of time for discussion. I appreciate the time you took to reply and discuss, absolutely, though. Thanks for this! ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

Thanks for sharing your analysis! ๐Ÿ™‹โ€โ™‚๏ธ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ‘‹

@infosec_jcp ๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿƒ done differently (@[email protected])

Content warning: RealTime Updated List of who to follow on the #fediverse

Infosec Exchange

@cmdr_nova

Hmm, this has been a ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšจ kinda Maven day where it looks like they ignored ... :

#AIPrivacyPolicy
( https://infosec.exchange/about )

&

#UserPrivacyPolicyโ„ข โœ“ ( #UPPโ„ขโœ“ )
( https://infosec.exchange/@infosec_jcp/111008351195769160 )

about commercial #LLM's using each servers' #UserData in a commercial LLM.

Odd timing but it's just gotten suuuuper cartooni-sh at this point, hasn't it? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšจ

โš ๏ธ
๐Ÿค–
๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ
๐Ÿ‘‡
https://infosec.exchange/@infosec_jcp/112599764912166605

Not oddly even #Twitters #xAI #Grok had the _same_ issue also. ยฏ\_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ

Ahh, they got shark zoned, ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ‘‡
https://infosec.exchange/@Uraael@blahaj.zone/112608224549806086

Infosec Exchange

A Mastodon instance for info/cyber security-minded people.

Mastodon hosted on infosec.exchange

@timbray

Probably similar to the
#UserPrivacyPolicyโ„ข โœ“
#UPPโ„ขโœ“

or the T&S at https://infosec.eXchange/about section no doubt. โ˜‘๏ธ

Infosec Exchange

A Mastodon instance for info/cyber security-minded people.

Mastodon hosted on infosec.exchange

Cross Platform #UserPrivacyPolicyโ„ขโœ“ does exist.

Copy. That!

Unless you have a good #UserPrivacyPolicy in place ( #UPPโ„ข โœ“ ) you may be seeding #AI so make sure you have BOTH on any #FreeWebHostingCulture #FreeWebHosting or so called by #MARCOM #SocialMedia servers.

Cheers ๐Ÿฅ‚๐Ÿป ๐Ÿ˜โœŠ

Feel free to borrow this #AIAccountability #BizDev Card! ๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ˜†

#AI isn't new.

What _I.S._ new is saying ' Transparency๐ŸคAI๐Ÿค Accountability ' is ' This IS the Way ', forward, for this ' new ' technology, since the 1960's, btw, info you can grok, just not iF you have a good #UserPrivacyPolicyโ„ขโœ“ ๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ˜†

I could see this for #PR and #HR types but... General Employees? That's just odd.

@mcc

Have you tried adding in a #UserPrivacyPolicy URL? You could write that and then use a link shortener or a direct link. I beta tested this on XAi's Grok ~36hrs after they launched Grok this year. Grok could not grok it. ๐Ÿ˜† I even let the admin know it was a trap ahead of time and to NOT get Grok to read and agree to my User Privacy Policy.

Here is a sample I used at Twitter & in the fediverse that you are welcome to use! ๐Ÿ’ฏ
โš ๏ธ๐Ÿ‘‡
https://infosec.exchange/@infosec_jcp/111008351195769160

@infosec_jcp ๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿƒ done differently (@[email protected])

Content warning: #infosec_jcp #UPPโ„ข #UserPrivacyPolicyโ„ข #FreeUserAccountPrivacyPolicyUpdate โ˜œ (โ†ผ_โ†ผ)

Infosec Exchange

Hmm, my #UPPโ„ขโœ“ hashtag on #Xitter got a spam ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ’ฉ๐Ÿšซ

Hahaha, #UserPrivacyPolicy FTW ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ˜‚

@molly0xfff @ben @dangillmor

Then defo DON'T implement a #fediverse #ToS or #UPPโ„ข๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ’ฉ๐Ÿ‘Ž โœ“ policy server or per user that stopped #Xai's #grok at #Xitter and on infoseceXchange. Don't. No. Stop. Don't.

Definitely DON'T have your own #UserPrivacyPolicy on each of your services. No. Stop. Don't.

https://infosec.exchange/@infosec_jcp/111524709239145200

@infosec_jcp ๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿƒ done differently (@[email protected])

Content warning: Defeating #AIdatamining #AI by #UPPโ„ข & #PrivacyPolicy's for fun

Infosec Exchange

@Em0nM4stodon

This sounds like you need a #UPPโ„ข #UserPrivacyPolicyโ„ข that is inclusive of values at the server and user level in regards to AI Commercial LLM's &, if you so desire, non-commercial AI LLM's.

โš ๏ธ
๐Ÿšซ
๐Ÿค–
๐Ÿ‘‡
https://infosec.exchange/@infosec_jcp/111008351195769160

See https://infosec.exchange/about and also my user privacy policy, which is available for free, for your profile and server /about. ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ“Œ

#PrivacyPolicy is a DEFENSIVE MechaMegaladon ๐Ÿฆˆ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ”ฅ

@infosec_jcp ๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿƒ done differently (@[email protected])

Content warning: #infosec_jcp #UPPโ„ข #UserPrivacyPolicyโ„ข #FreeUserAccountPrivacyPolicyUpdate โ˜œ (โ†ผ_โ†ผ)

Infosec Exchange