By "#usable" I mean that you can #browse #profiles (instead of just beeing presented with what the #algorithm thinks you might be interested in, is profile text centred (and not picture centred), #search for #profile #text items, just be able to (send and) receive #messages even if I have not "liked back", ... -- #alovoa actually is pretty #unusable as I find it)
A #nonfederated #mastodon instance e.g. :-).
(½)
Does, as alternative to commercial #dating platforms, something like a #fediverse instance or other #noncommercial/ not-centrally-owned platform aimed at finding people for private connections exist which is #usable [s. reply]?
By "dating" I mean: Not limited to (but not excluding either) #romantic or #sexual encounters, but also to find #friendships, "#platonic"/#aromantic #relationships, #buddies for #activities, etc.
And I wish openness for #queerness, #nonbinary, #agender, #lgbt* etc.
2/5
Sweden and Finland have #accessibility in their digital DNA.
Other countries are still in an early stage or apply it in an inconsistent way.
Are we designing with accessibility because law says so, or because we want #products #usable for all people?