Selon Martin Baker, il s’agit de la dixième éjection réussie depuis un F-35 #UASF #Crash #F35

https://www.aerobuzz.fr/breves-defense/crash-dun-f-35a-de-lusaf-en-alaska/

Crash d’un F-35A de l’USAF en Alaska - Aerobuzz

Un avion du 354th Fight Wing s’est écrasé le 28 janvier 2025 sur la base d’Eielson. Une vidéo diffusée sur les réseaux sociaux montre l’éjection réussie du pilote. L’avion a été détruit. La vidéo diffusée sur une page Facebook non officielle montre le F-35A train sorti, hors de contrôle, en train de plonger vers le

Aerobuzz

In light of attacks on #generalComputing, our mind goes to a phrase the bitcoin community coined in 2016/17.

The term "#UserActivatedSoftFork", or #UASF, was small bitcoin node operators resisting the bigs' attempt to have large blockSizes which would compromise #security of #Bitcoin.

The #bigTechBlocker is similar. Its a '#UserActivatedAntitrustLaw' that prevents the decent into #technoFeudalism. And hyper-#massSurveillance.

DFCA:
https://notabug.org/dfca/dfca

#no2x demostró que los mineros y las empresas no controlan bitcoin.

#uasf demostró que los desarrolladores no controlan bitcoin.

Los ordinals y las inscripciones demostraron que los maxis no controlan bitcoin.

Bitcoin ha demostrado ser descentralizado, ¡no hay segundo mejor!”
---
RT @BitcoinPierre
#no2x proved that miners and businesses don’t control bitcoin.

#uasf proved that developers don’t control bitcoin.

Ordinals and insc…
https://twitter.com/BitcoinPierre/status/1622249776480649217

Pierre Rochard on Twitter

“#no2x proved that miners and businesses don’t control bitcoin. #uasf proved that developers don’t control bitcoin. Ordinals and inscriptions proved that bitcoin maxis don’t control bitcoin. Bitcoin is proven decentralized, there really is no second best!”

Twitter
If you really aren't willing to take a "I have no idea the extent of the damage this could do, but Imma do it anyways" mindset, you aren't ready for a UASF
---
RT @Bitcoin_Wifey
This is what a real #UASF looks like.
https://twitter.com/Bitcoin_Wifey/status/1560450805789904897
𝒥❀𝓎𝒸𝑒 on Twitter

“This is what a real #UASF looks like.”

Twitter

Saatavilla myös suomeksi: https://konsensus.network/product/lohkokokosota
---
RT @JoeNakamoto
Happy #UASF and bitcoin Independence Day. If you haven’t read the blocksize war yet, do.

It’s up there in the top 5 #Bitcoin books and explains why today may be celebrated as a holiday in decades to come.
https://twitter.com/JoeNakamoto/status/1554160732094316546

Lohkokokosota | Konsensus Network

A great listen if you want to get a better technical understanding of #URSF as well as #UASF.

#Bitcoin

https://nadobtc.libsyn.com/ursfs-user-rejected-soft-forks-episode-57

Bitcoin Explained - The Technical Side of Bitcoin: URSFs (User Rejected Soft Forks) - Episode 57

In this episode of Bitcoin, Explained, hosts Aaron van Wirdum and Sjors Provoost discuss URSFs, which stands for either User Rejected Soft Forks or User Resisted Soft Forks, depending on who you ask. URSFs are a recently introduced tool in Bitcoin’s upgrade mechanism toolkit. In the first part of the episode, Aaron and Sjors explain that URSFs are best considered the mirror equivalent of UASFs (User Activated Soft Forks) with mandated signaling. Where UASFs will towards the end of a soft fork activation window reject blocks that don’t signal readiness for a soft fork, URSFs will reject blocks that do signal. If both UASF and URSF clients are deployed, they would in principle create a split in the blockchain. In the second part of the episode, the duo outlines the various soft fork upgrade mechanisms, ranging from MASFs (Miner Activated Soft Forks), flag day activated UASFs and mandated signaling UASFs. Aaron then explains why he believes mandated signaling UASFs are his preferred method of deploying soft forks, and why he thinks URSFs should in the future be offered as an added option for users who prefer to reject the soft fork. Finally, Sjors lays out the “rough consensus” guidelines as used in context of the Internet Engineering Taskforce (IETF), and how this applies to Bitcoin upgrades.

2017 a été l'année de résolution du débat sur la scalabilité de #Bitcoin marquée par l’influence du User Activated Soft Fork #UASF et l'activation de #SegWit 🔗 https://journalducoin.com/analyses/guerre-civile-de-bitcoin-linfluence-de-luser-activated-soft-fork-uasf/
Guerre civile de Bitcoin : L'influence de l'User Activated Soft Fork (UASF)

2017 a été l'année de résolution du débat sur la scalabilité de Bitcoin, marquée par l'User Activated Soft Fork et l'activation de SegWit.

Journal du Coin

In 2017, miners attempted to assert control over the #Bitcoin protocol, and failed thanks to #BIP148 / #UASF.

Later, exchanges attempted to assert control over the protocol, and failed again (#NO2X).

In 2021, developers attempted to assert control over the protocol by reverting to BIP9, and reintroducing and enforcing the miner veto, after the community came to consensus on BIP8.

It's not entirely clear if that failed or succeeded. But it should receive the same reaction: complete resistance.

@michaelfolkson I foresee a time when large "stake" holders will campaign for #bitcoin proof of stake. They will claim Austrian, "Hayek - Mises " economics are just views projected onto Bitcoin by current toxic maximalist and not actually what Satoshi wanted.

Morons like Peter will accept this and promote to the masses, while trillionaires spin up enough nodes to prevent forever another #uasf

This of course will make Bitcoin even stronger. It'll be fine....

Don't forget and take the history of #bitcoin for granted.
#UASF
---
RT @mir_btc
1st of August is over:
UASF succeeded
Segwit locked in
btc prize stable
BCH makes roger & traders happy & segwit2x even more indefensible.
https://twitter.com/mir_btc/status/892631204746350598
🤌 🟩 MIR ⚡ 🤌 on Twitter

“1st of August is over: UASF succeeded Segwit locked in btc prize stable BCH makes roger & traders happy & segwit2x even more indefensible.”

Twitter