📻 8h40, 13h15, 16h30, 20h15 sur #RadioSensations 98.4
🎛️ Réalisation @JessyWls
🎧 Podcasts >
A great listen if you want to get a better technical understanding of #URSF as well as #UASF.
https://nadobtc.libsyn.com/ursfs-user-rejected-soft-forks-episode-57
In this episode of Bitcoin, Explained, hosts Aaron van Wirdum and Sjors Provoost discuss URSFs, which stands for either User Rejected Soft Forks or User Resisted Soft Forks, depending on who you ask. URSFs are a recently introduced tool in Bitcoin’s upgrade mechanism toolkit. In the first part of the episode, Aaron and Sjors explain that URSFs are best considered the mirror equivalent of UASFs (User Activated Soft Forks) with mandated signaling. Where UASFs will towards the end of a soft fork activation window reject blocks that don’t signal readiness for a soft fork, URSFs will reject blocks that do signal. If both UASF and URSF clients are deployed, they would in principle create a split in the blockchain. In the second part of the episode, the duo outlines the various soft fork upgrade mechanisms, ranging from MASFs (Miner Activated Soft Forks), flag day activated UASFs and mandated signaling UASFs. Aaron then explains why he believes mandated signaling UASFs are his preferred method of deploying soft forks, and why he thinks URSFs should in the future be offered as an added option for users who prefer to reject the soft fork. Finally, Sjors lays out the “rough consensus” guidelines as used in context of the Internet Engineering Taskforce (IETF), and how this applies to Bitcoin upgrades.
⚠️OH BUT WAIT! THERE IS MORE!⚠️
So not only Jermey, the guy spearheading #BIP119, co-founded MIT DCI and has for its Sr. advisor the commissioner of the SEC, the founding director of DCI Mr Forde, is a #WEF Young Global Leader.
#URSF #BITCOIN #CTV
Can't make this shit up!!
---
RT @s3cp256k1
Take 2.
If you're confused about who is behind #BIP119 and if you should support it, let me explain in 4 pics. #bitcoin https://t.co/0ZTWR7M0o1
https://twitter.com/s3cp256k1/status/1521238634111770624
“If the expectation of an active resistance against BIP-119 activation is able to defuse it and raise awareness about the dangers of contingent soft forks, this will have a positive outcome, as it makes Bitcoin stronger against more dangerous fork attempts (e.g. BIP-300). #URSF”