On this date 202 years ago, Jane Taylor (1783-1824) died this day.

Poetry available in the #RomanticPeriodPoetryArchive:
https://www.romanticperiodpoetry.org/authors/#id/pers00034

#poetry #DH #Romanticism #19thC #OTD

OTD (179 years ago): Erik Gustaf Geijer (1783-1847) died this day.

Poetry available in the #RomanticPeriodPoetryArchive:
https://www.romanticperiodpoetry.org/authors/#id/pers00356

#poetry #DH #Romanticism #19thC #OTD

A quotation from Doyle

Detection is, or ought to be, an exact science and should be treated in the same cold and unemotional manner. You have attempted to tinge it with romanticism, which produces much the same effect as if you worked a love-story or an elopement into the fifth proposition of Euclid.

Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) British writer and physician
Story (1890-02), โ€œThe Sign of the Four,โ€ ch. 1 [Holmes], Lippincottโ€™s Monthly Magazine, Vol. 45 (US) / 1 (UK)

More about this quote: wist.info/doyle-arthur-conan/8โ€ฆ

#quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #doyle #arthurconandoyle #holmes #sherlockholmes #sherlock #detective #exactitude #rationality #romanticism

Doyle, Arthur Conan - Story (1890-02), "The Sign of the Four," ch. 1 [Holmes], Lippincott's Monthly Magazine, Vol. 45 (US) / 1 (UK) | WIST Quotations

Detection is, or ought to be, an exact science and should be treated in the same cold and unemotional manner. You have attempted to tinge it with romanticism, which produces much the same effect as if you worked a love-story or an elopement into the fifth proposition of Euclid. Critiquingโ€ฆ

WIST Quotations

Lyrical Ballads by Wordsworth and Coleridge


Origins

Lyrical Ballads (1798) stands as one of the most transformative publications in English literary history, marking the formal beginning of the Romantic Age in English literature. Its origins lie in the remarkable friendship and creative collaboration between William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who became neighbours in Somerset in 1797.

The immediate catalyst for the collection was financial and practical โ€” the two poets needed money to fund a walking tour of Germany. However, the deeper intellectual roots ran far more profound. Wordsworth and Coleridge had been engaged in intense discussions about the nature of poetry, imagination, and the relationship between humanity and nature. These conversations crystallised into a shared poetic vision that challenged the dominant Augustan aesthetics of the 18th century, particularly the polished, formal verse associated with Alexander Pope and his contemporaries.

The two poets divided their creative labour deliberately. As Coleridge later recalled in Biographia Literaria (1817), Wordsworth was to write about ordinary subjects โ€” rural life, common people, everyday experience โ€” and invest them with the wonder of the imagination. Coleridge, on the other hand, would write about supernatural subjects and attempt to make them feel psychologically real and believable. This division of labour produced two of the most celebrated poems in the English language: Wordsworthโ€™s โ€œLines Written a Few Miles above Tintern Abbeyโ€ and Coleridgeโ€™s โ€œThe Rime of the Ancient Marinerโ€, both of which appeared in the first edition.

The Preface and Poetic Manifesto

The 1800 second edition included Wordsworthโ€™s celebrated Preface, which became the manifesto of Romanticism. In it, Wordsworth made several radical declarations:

  • Poetry should be written in โ€œthe real language of menโ€, not the elevated, artificial diction of the classical tradition.
  • The proper subjects of poetry were humble and rustic life, where human passions exist in a purer, more natural state.
  • Poetry was defined memorably as โ€œthe spontaneous overflow of powerful feelingsโ€ recollected in tranquillity.
  • The poet was not a craftsman following rules, but a person of exceptional sensitivity and imaginative power speaking to common human experience.

These ideas struck at the heart of neoclassical poetic theory and opened the door to the deeply personal, nature-centred, and emotionally honest poetry that would define the Romantic movement for the next half century.

Significance

1. Launch of English Romanticism

Lyrical Ballads is widely regarded as the founding text of the Romantic Movement in England. It shifted attention from reason and order (values of the Enlightenment) to feeling, intuition, imagination, and nature as the primary sources of poetic truth.

2. Democratisation of Poetry

By choosing subjects from ordinary rural life โ€” beggars, shepherds, abandoned mothers, and simple villagers โ€” Wordsworth challenged the aristocratic and classical subject matter that had dominated English poetry. Poetry was brought to the people and, in a sense, given back to them.

3. The Power of Nature

The collection established Nature as a moral and spiritual force, not merely a scenic backdrop. Particularly in Wordsworthโ€™s poems, landscapes become teachers, healers, and sources of transcendence โ€” a vision that would deeply influence later Romantic poets like Keats, Shelley, and Byron.

4. The Supernatural and the Psychological

Coleridgeโ€™s contributions, especially The Rime of the Ancient Mariner and the fragment Kubla Khan, explored guilt, sin, the unconscious, and the uncanny. This opened new psychological dimensions in English poetry that anticipated later literary movements including Gothic fiction and even aspects of Modernism.

5. Influence on Later Literature

The impact of Lyrical Ballads extended far beyond poetry. Its emphasis on individual experience, the dignity of common life, and the primacy of imagination influenced the 19th-century novel (Dickens, Hardy, George Eliot), American Transcendentalism (Emerson, Thoreau, Whitman), and the broader tradition of nature writing that persists to this day.

6. A New Critical Language

Wordsworthโ€™s Preface also inaugurated a new way of talking about poetry โ€” in terms of emotion, imagination, and organic form rather than adherence to classical rules. This critical vocabulary remains foundational to literary studies.

Conclusion

Lyrical Ballads was far more than a slim volume of verse โ€” it was a revolutionary act of literary imagination. Born from friendship, conversation, and a shared dissatisfaction with the poetic conventions of their age, Wordsworth and Coleridge created a work that redefined what poetry could be, who it could speak to, and what truths it could tell. Its echoes have never ceased to resound through English literature and beyond.

The book for free download here:

https://ia800202.us.archive.org/22/items/lyricalballads00worduoft/lyricalballads00worduoft.pdf

#EnglishLiterature #LiteraryAnalysis #LiteraryHistory #LyricalBallads #NatureInPoetry #Poem #Poetry #RomanticPoetry #Romanticism #SamuelTaylorColeridge #TheRimeOfTheAncientMariner #WilliamWordsworth

OTD, Dositej Obradoviฤ‡ (1742-1811) and William Lisle Bowles (1762-1850) died this day.

Poems are included in the #RomanticPeriodPoetryArchive:
https://www.romanticperiodpoetry.org/

#poetry #DH #Romanticism #19thC #OTD

In Chapter X. I set you children a question:โ€”Why did Jacob's angels come down a ladder, whereas other Hebrews saw angels mixed up with romantic pretty things such as wings and clouds?
I hope some of you have made a guess before now; but some are not good at guessing. I will tell you what may help you to find out.
If a bird wants to go up and downโ€ฆ

โ€” Mary Everest Boole
https://palimpseste.vercel.app/#text/702dbe06-8dbe-4fec-81ac-315112bf88f4
#novel #romanticism #bookstodon #books #literature

Palimpseste โ€” Dรฉrivez ร  travers la littรฉrature mondiale

Un flux infini d'extraits littรฉraires de l'Antiquitรฉ au XXe siรจcle. 7 sources, 12 langues, open source.

Palimpseste

Genealogical Diagram: From Romanticism to Marxism, National Socialism, and Fascism

โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ ROUSSEAU & ROMANTICISM โ”‚ โ”‚ Natural self โ€ข Emotion โ€ข Authenticity โ”‚ โ”‚ Anti-rationalism โ€ข Volk (Herder) โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚ โ–ผ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ KANT (Critical Philosophy) โ”‚ โ”‚ Limits of reason โ€ข Transcendental subject โ”‚ โ”‚ Moral autonomy โ€ข Noumena/phenomena โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚ โ–ผ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ FICHTE & EARLY GERMAN IDEALISM โ”‚ โ”‚ The โ€œIโ€ posits itself โ€ข Struggle โ€ข Nationalism โ”‚ โ”‚ State as moral educator โ€ข Volk as spiritual unity โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚ โ–ผ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ SCHELLING (Nature Philosophy) โ”‚ โ”‚ Romantic metaphysics โ€ข Nature as Spirit โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚ โ–ผ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ HEGEL (High German Idealism) โ”‚ โ”‚ Dialectic โ€ข Spirit โ€ข History โ€ข State โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ผโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ–ผ โ–ผ โ–ผ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ MARXISM โ”‚ โ”‚ NATIONAL SOCIALISM โ”‚ โ”‚ FASCISM โ”‚ โ”‚ (Hegel inverted; โ”‚ โ”‚ (Fichtean nationalism; โ”‚ โ”‚ (Romantic will; myth; โ”‚ โ”‚ class dialectic) โ”‚ โ”‚ anti-Hegel due to Marx) โ”‚ โ”‚ State as unity) โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ–ผ โ–ผ โ–ผ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ COMMUNISM โ”‚ โ”‚ HITLERISM / NAZISM โ”‚ โ”‚ MUSSOLINIโ€™S FASCISM โ”‚ โ”‚ (Proletarian state) โ”‚ โ”‚ (Rosenberg uses Fichte, not โ”‚ โ”‚ (Sorel + nationalism + โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”‚ Hegel; Volk + race + State) โ”‚ โ”‚ modernist authoritarianism) โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜

How to Read the Genealogy

1. Rousseau & Romanticism โ€” the emotional and moral root system

Rousseau and the early Romantic movement sit at the same level because they are essentially two expressions of the same worldview. Rousseau provides the philosophical core; Romanticism turns it into a cultural force.

Together they supply the soil from which later ideologies grow:

  • authenticity over rationalism
  • the natural self as morally pure
  • suspicion of civilisation and modernity
  • the heroic individual
  • the Volk as an organic cultural community (Johann Gottfried Herderโ€™s contribution)
  • emotion as a guide to truth

This is the preโ€‘ideological foundation that later thinkers will systematise, politicise, or weaponise.

2. Kant โ€” the bridge from Romantic sentiment to philosophical structure

Immanuel Kant is not a Romantic, but he provides the crucial intellectual machinery that makes German Idealism possible:

  • the transcendental subject
  • the limits of empirical reason
  • the autonomy of the moral will
  • the distinction between appearance and reality

Kant gives later thinkers the architecture they need to turn Romantic intuitions into philosophical systems.

3. Fichte & Early German Idealism โ€” the nationalist and voluntarist turn

Fichte stands at the same level as Early German Idealism because he is its first full expression. He radicalises Kant and fuses him with Romantic nationalism.

Fichte introduces:

  • the self (โ€œIโ€) as worldโ€‘creating
  • struggle as the engine of moral development
  • the State as educator and moral shaper
  • the Volk as a spiritual community defined by language and culture
  • the idea that national unity is a moral imperative

This is why the National Socialists later mined him so heavily: he provides a philosophical justification for unity, struggle, and State supremacy without the Marxist baggage attached to Hegel.

4. Schelling โ€” the Romantic metaphysician

Schelling blends Romanticism and Idealism into a metaphysics of nature:

  • nature as living Spirit
  • the unity of mind and world
  • the aesthetic as a path to truth

He is the bridge between Fichteโ€™s voluntarism and Hegelโ€™s systemโ€‘building.

5. Hegel โ€” the systemโ€‘builder of history and the State

Hegel takes the entire Romanticโ€“Idealist inheritance and turns it into a grand historical machine:

  • the dialectic
  • Spirit unfolding through conflict
  • history as rational development
  • the State as the embodiment of ethical life
  • freedom as recognition within institutions

Hegel is the pivot point. From him, the ideological branches diverge.

  • Marx takes Hegelโ€™s dialectic and flips it upside down: materialism instead of Spirit, class instead of consciousness.
  • National Socialists reject Hegel because Marx used him, turning instead to Fichte and Herder.
  • Fascists borrow the Romanticโ€“voluntarist elements (myth, will, unity) without the metaphysical system.

6. The Three Ideological Descendants

Marxism

  • class struggle
  • materialism
  • historical determinism
  • the dialectic inverted
  • the State as instrument of class rule

Marxism is Hegel without Spirit, Romanticism without the individual, and Fichte without the nation.

National Socialism

  • racial struggle
  • Volk as biological destiny
  • State supremacy
  • unity through exclusion
  • Fichtean nationalism + Herderian cultural unity

Nazism is Fichte radicalised, Herder racialised, and Romanticism weaponised.

Fascism

  • myth
  • will
  • unity
  • antiโ€‘liberal modernism
  • the State as a living organism

Fascism is Romanticism without Rousseau, Fichte without metaphysics, and Hegel with the โ€œcorrectโ€ dialectic.

7. The Big Picture

All three ideologies โ€” Marxism, National Socialism, and Fascism โ€” draw from the same Romanticโ€“Idealist well, but each selects different ingredients:

  • Marxism takes Hegelโ€™s dialectic and Rousseauโ€™s egalitarian moralism.
  • National Socialism takes Fichteโ€™s nationalism and Herderโ€™s Volk metaphysics.
  • Fascism takes Romantic will, myth, and the unified State.

They are siblings, not strangers โ€” born from the same intellectual family, but raised in different political households.

#Fascism #Fascists #MarxismAndMarxists #NationalSocialism #Philosophy #Romanticism #Socialism #Socialists
Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Originator of Western Self-Loathing

Jean-Jacques Rousseau is often misclassified as an Enlightenment thinker. He was not. He was the first Romantic ideologueโ€”a man who rejected the rationalism, empiricism, and classical liberalism thโ€ฆ

No Minister