OpenEd23 Recap
Did you miss out on the Open Education Conference this year or couldn't get to every session because they had 500,000 really cool concurrent things? Never fear! I got you. Well, at least for the sessions I attended.
OpenEd23 Recap
Did you miss out on the Open Education Conference this year or couldn't get to every session because they had 500,000 really cool concurrent things? Never fear! I got you. Well, at least for the sessions I attended.
I've only recently become aware of the #OSCQR standards, and I absolutely love that they're CC-BY openly licensed. Engaging with them was one of many great outcomes of #OpenEd23!
Can anyone more familiar with them help me better understand why Standard 4 asserts that a lack of editability is better than providing a range of document types, including .doc(x)?
The fullest explanation I can find is here: https://oscqr.suny.edu/standard4/
It repeatedly stresses "editable = bad," but doesn't explain precisely why, or detail what scenarios this lack of editability will solve.
From my #accessibility-focused perspective, allowing students ease of access in a wide variety of formats is generally best.
Is "don't edit" meant to avoid students accidentally editing and confusing themselves? Concerns about academic integrity? Fears that someone will misrepresent the syllabus outside of the institution? #higherEd