Some light reading: "AI Readiness: A Reusability Study of Popular AI Algorithms", Quick & Kasula, #HICSS2025

"56 of the 75 algorithms repositories led to errors before or during the code execution phase."

I wonder howl long my latest #Zenodo-archived artefact will be useful...but I hope with Haskell's `stack` it'll build for a while before the upstream package repo(s) bitrot.

https://hdl.handle.net/10125/109731

AI Readiness: A Reusability Study of Popular AI Algorithms

The FAIR Data Principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability provide a roadmap to reusing data analysis findings and reproducibility of AI-based data analysis. However, the work done during this research project has identified an issue that impacts AI reproducibility before code and data interoperability can be considered. Namely, code reusability when attempting to recreate the hardware and system-level software or the โ€œruntime environment.โ€ While attempting to determine the metadata needed to FAIRly couple datasets with AI algorithms, the research team determined that the problem of recreating the runtime environment of published state-of-the-art algorithms from the website Papers with Code provided a hurdle that must be overcome before automated data-algorithm coupling can be considered. While containerization solutions such as Docker or Singularity are created to address the issue of inconsistent runtime environments, few AI algorithm developers have embraced publishing containers alongside their AI codes, opting for documenting software dependencies, which only tell part of the runtime story. Additionally, containers are software, and many issues affecting the recreation of runtime environments can also affect orchestrated container solutions. This work describes the process employed to survey 75 openly available AI algorithms, as recorded by Papers with Code, spanning the machine learning areas of computer vision, audio analysis, and natural language processing. It also makes a case that merely publishing the algorithm software repository and datasets used to benchmark the accuracy of the analysis is not enough to enable the reproducibility of results or reuse of AI algorithms. Finally, it identifies the gap in runtime environment reusability between code repositories like GitHub and commercial services like Hugging Face to focus future work. It proposes providing solutions like a container library, enhanced documentation, and other methods to allow reproducible and reusable research and a roadmap for continuing toward a review of enhancing AI-ready data.

Double the fun - that's why we have the second #Hawaii Paper Alert! ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ”ฌ๐ŸŒด ๐Ÿ–

In "๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€: ๐—” ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ผ-๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐——๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป," we explored the complexity behind the spread of false information, particularly in the context of social media and information systems.

You can find the full paper here:
https://hdl.handle.net/10125/109630

#fakenews #falseinformation #misinformation #disinformation #propaganda #informationsystems #socialmedia #wirtschaftsinformatik #hicss #hicss2025

Sharing Lies: A Socio-Technical Review on False Information Dissemination

This paper provides a comprehensive review of false information dissemination, focusing on factors influencing its spread in the context of social media and information systems. The study synthesizes recent literature to identify and categorize 30 influence factors into eight main categories: demographic, personality-related, psychological, policy- and values-based, informational, media consumption-related, motivational, and preventive factors. Key findings indicate that low education, high extraversion, and conservative values significantly increase false information dissemination. Additionally, social media usage, emotional responses, and information overload play critical roles in promoting its dissemination. Preventive strategies, such as labeling content and training in false information recognition, are also examined. This review aims to improve understanding of the dynamics of false information dissemination and proposes strategies to mitigate its impact.

Fabian Walke and Thaddรคa Nรผrnberger are "Sharing Lies" ๐Ÿ˜ฒ No, this isn't clickbaitโ€”it's the title of our latest research paper, which we'll be presenting at the #HICSS2025 conference ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿซ.

In "๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€: ๐—” ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ผ-๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐——๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป," we explored the complexity behind the spread of false information, particularly in the context of social media and information systems.

#HICSS #Misinformation #Disinformation #Deepfake #FakeNews