UK press can opt out of AI overviews, stay in searches

YouTube
To be fair, if I set my default search provider in #GoogleChrome to #GoogleSearch it will give me a button for #GoogleLens in the address bar when looking at #GooglePhotos, so #GoogleGemini was right about that. Thanks, #Google.
Google Business tricks that would help your business in 2026

Optimizing your Google Business Profile (GBP); the tool that controls how your business appears on Google Maps and local search results is no longer a "set-and-forget" task.

GTech Booster

《Die Richter gehen davon aus, ein normal informierter und aufmerksamer Nutzer erkenne, [...]》
《Er verstehe, dass die KI relevante Inhalte auf Basis von Berechnungen zusammenfasse [...]》
— Da habe ich meine Zweifel ... 🤔

KI in Suchmaschine: #Google  siegt im ersten Markenstreit über KI-Ergebnisse | heise online https://www.heise.de/news/KI-in-Suchmaschine-Google-siegt-im-ersten-Markenstreit-ueber-KI-Ergebnisse-11334653.html #GoogleSuche #GoogleSearch

KI in Suchmaschine: Google siegt im ersten Markenstreit über KI-Ergebnisse

Das Landgericht Berlin sieht in KI-generierten Übersichten keine Markenverletzung durch Google. Doch IT-Juristen kritisieren das zugrunde gelegte Nutzerbild.

heise online

Google updates help doc to say LLMS.txt won't help or hurt you in Google Search and Google Search does not use them or markdown files https://www.seroundtable.com/google-llms-txt-files-hurt-help-41512.html

#google #seo #googleseo #googlesearch #llms #llm #markdown #ai

Google Search is rolling out Information agents in AI Mode for paid subscribers https://seroundtable.com/google-search-information-agents-41502.html via
@rmstein

#google #googleaimode #googleai #googlesearch #ai #search

RT @heynavtoor: You have noticed that too. Google Search is getting worse. The results look professional but say nothing. The answers are longer but less useful. Every page reads like it was written by the same voice. You thought Google was broken. It is not broken. It is being replaced. Researchers published a paper at the ACM Web Conference 2026 proving what is happening. They call it Retrieval Collapse. Here is the mechanism in one sentence. AI-generated content is flooding the internet so fast that search engines are now showing you mostly AI-written pages. And the search engine cannot tell the difference. They ran a controlled experiment. They started with a pool of real, human-written web pages. Then they gradually added AI-generated content until it made up 67% of the pool. By that point, over 80% of the top search results were AI-generated. Not 67%. Over 80%. The ranking algorithm did not just let AI content in. It preferred it. The AI-written pages were better optimized, more fluent, and more keyword-rich than the human pages. They outranked the originals. Here is the part that makes this invisible. Answer accuracy stayed the same. The search results still looked correct. The information was still technically right. If you measured quality by accuracy alone, nothing appeared wrong. But source diversity collapsed. Nearly every result came from the same type of content. AI-written. AI-optimized. AI-structured. The human-written pages, the ones with original reporting, personal experience, and genuine expertise, were buried. The researchers describe a two-stage collapse. Sta…

mehr auf Arint.info

#Google #GoogleSearch #make #searchengine #arint_info

https://x.com/heynavtoor/status/2065883159477264498#m

Arint - SEO+KI (@[email protected])

<p>RT @heynavtoor: You have noticed that too. Google Search is getting worse. The results look professional but say nothing. The answers are longer but less useful. Every page reads like it was written by the same voice. You thought Google was broken. It is not broken. It is being replaced. Researchers published a paper at the ACM Web Conference 2026 proving what is happening. They call it Retrieval Collapse. Here is the mechanism in one sentence. AI-generated content is flooding the internet so fast that search engines are now showing you mostly AI-written pages. And the search engine cannot tell the difference. They ran a controlled experiment. They started with a pool of real, human-written web pages. Then they gradually added AI-generated content until it made up 67% of the pool. By that point, over 80% of the top search results were AI-generated. Not 67%. Over 80%. The ranking algorithm did not just let AI content in. It preferred it. The AI-written pages were better optimized, more fluent, and more keyword-rich than the human pages. They outranked the originals. Here is the part that makes this invisible. Answer accuracy stayed the same. The search results still looked correct. The information was still technically right. If you measured quality by accuracy alone, nothing appeared wrong. But source diversity collapsed. Nearly every result came from the same type of content. AI-written. AI-optimized. AI-structured. The human-written pages, the ones with original reporting, personal experience, and genuine expertise, were buried. The researchers describe a two-stage collapse. Sta…</p> <p><a href="https://arint.info/@Arint/116749321391976969">mehr</a> auf <a href="https://arint.info/">Arint.info</a></p> <p>#Google #GoogleSearch #make #searchengine #arint_info</p> <p><a href="https://x.com/heynavtoor/status/2065883159477264498#m">https://x.com/heynavtoor/status/2065883159477264498#m</a></p>

Mastodon Glitch Edition
Google haftet für KI-Antworten: Wie Du Dich gegen falsche AI Overviews wehrst

Das Landgericht München I macht Google für falsche Aussagen in den AI Overviews haftbar. Erfahre, wie Du Dich gegen Rufmord durch KI-Antworten zur Wehr setzt.

techUpdate.io
LG München I: Google für falsche Aussagen in KI-Übersichten verurteilt

Das Landgericht München I verurteilt Google, unwahre Behauptungen über Verlage in der KI-Suchfunktion verbreitet zu haben.

heise online