"Putin 2024: Meduza breaks down the evidence pointing to the most fraudulent elections in modern Russian history" [1]

This is absolute paranoia. Nadezhdin might have got 5-10% of votes but his candidacy was refused [2]. The most popular validated candidate, Davankov, might have got 5-10% [2]. And yet the electoral bureaucracy blatantly falsified the results.

[1] https://meduza.io/en/feature/2024/03/21/putin-2024

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Russian_presidential_election#Opinion_polls

#ChurovsSaw #RussianElection2024 #ElectionForensics #ElectionFraud #Statistics

Putin 2024 Meduza breaks down the evidence pointing to the most fraudulent elections in modern Russian history — Meduza

On March 18, Russia’s Central Election Commission (CEC) announced that Vladimir Putin would remain in power for a fifth presidential term, following a landslide “election” win. According to the CEC’s preliminary data, Putin received a record-breaking 87.28 percent of the vote with an equally record-breaking voter turnout of 77.44 percent. Surprisingly, the CEC continues to publish data on individual polling stations, making it possible to piece together how the authorities manufactured these unprecedented results. Peculiarities in the vote count itself paint a clear picture of what appears to be the most fraudulent election in Russia’s modern history. Meduza examines the evidence.

Meduza

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford%27s_law=

Still questioning #electionIntegrity around #election2020 or even #election2022? #Antiscience Hooey.

To all at #FoxNews and all the other Trumpian #socialmedia acolytes still using doubt and fear for political or financial advantage, while pushing us toward civil war: show us the #dataforensics #electionforensics' #datascience or stfu.

Here a blurb on #electiondata from wikipedia on #BenfordsLaw to tell you where you need to look.

Benford's law - Wikipedia