Level 98 🇺🇦@[email protected] It is "clearly" part of the President's official acts to uphold the rule of law? So the current President can dissolve SCOTUS and replace it with one that reverses this ruling as its first act. It is non-violent AND, almost paradoxically, affirms his commitment to the rule of law. #DissolveSCOTUS
@courtcan I suggest the current President restores order by using this chaos. He can dissolve SCOTUS and replace it with one that reverses this ruling as its first act. It is non-violent AND, almost paradoxically, affirms his commitment to the rule of law. #DissolveSCOTUS
@kbeninato Ironically, possibly they could. The President would seem to have the ability to dissolve SCOTUS and replace it with one that reverses that last ruling. #DissolveSCOTUS
Surely the US President can now dissolve SCOTUS and replace it with one that actually cares about the rule of law that then reverses that last ruling as its first act? #DissolveSCOTUS
Democracy Matters 
The #SCOTUS ethics policy is shit. Shame on you, #JohnRoberts!
MJ Musehttps://apnews.com/article/mississippi-voting-felony-supreme-court-jim-crow-224aa2ccd441b8bd7c0828398234e7e6 Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to Mississippi’s Jim Crow-era ban on voting after some felonies
#IllegitimateSCOTUS U.S. Supreme Court said Friday that it will not stop Mississippi from removing voting rights from people convicted of certain felonies — a practice that originated in the Jim Crow era with the intent of stopping Black men from influencing elections #RacistSCOTUS #ExpandSCOTUS #DISSOLVESCOTUS
Supreme Court won't hear challenge to Mississippi's Jim Crow-era ban on voting after some felonies
The U.S. Supreme Court says it will not stop Mississippi from removing voting rights from people convicted of certain felonies — a practice that originated in the Jim Crow era with the intent of stopping Black men from influencing elections. A majority of justices on Friday declined to reconsider a 2022 decision by a conservative appeals court. That ruling said Mississippi had remedied the discriminatory intent of the original provisions in the state constitution by altering the list of disenfranchising crimes. In a dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to Mississippi’s felony disenfranchisement provisions 125 years ago, and “this Court blinks again today."