#4
I began with this project in November and the last day was in mid January. Not the longest data dig for me, but one of the longer ones. And I abandoned it unfinished.
I like it a lot.
Mostly because I like the paper by Smoulder, vanWesten et al a lot.
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2025GL116242
Important to know where we might see Early Warning signals EWS for an imminent #AMOCcollapse. That way we can monitor the oh-shit-location more closely – and look for past behaviour in proxies.
Just recently, vanWesten's team in Utrecht published a new study that looks at an oh-shit-location in the Gulfstream.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-026-03309-1
"Abrupt Gulf Stream path changes are a precursor to a collapse". You probably read about it: 2 years before convection tips into then-inevitable death in the Subpolar Gyre, the Gulfstream jumps 200km north.
Smoulder identified that wider location as well as one of her EWS zones. In my project it's called "gstream" (top right corner in each chart, in the subtitles says which zone and which season the matching pixels are for). It's a zone with far fewer matching pixels than most others. Only the zone in the North Sea has even fewer.
When I say, I abandoned the project, I mean that I did not begin to match the identified pixels with actual proxies from #paleoclimate – which is the ultimate goal of the project.
So it made me laugh when I saw the Tasmanian coral getting tied to #AMOC in the new paper in #1 and finding Tasmania in my old, dusty project. 💃🏽 🖖🏽