I have a complicated #opensource #AGPLv3Compliance question:
Let's say I bought a closed-source WordPress plugin for a public website.
Then, WordPress (or a fork) changed its license to AGPLv3 and I updated to that.
Does the AGPLv3 now apply to the proprietary plugin I purchased?
If not, under what circumstances would it trigger?
@ouvaton Je ne savais pas que le code source d'Overleaf soit sous l' #AGPL . Ce qui implique que chaque instance doit de façon *évidente* informer ses utilisateurs de cela : "a convenient and prominently visible feature" [0]
A coup d'oeil et par #SearXNG j'ai l'impression qu'Overleaf.com viole grossièrement l' #AGPLv3 . La licence est hyper-cachée.
#AGPLViolation #AGPLv3Compliance
[0] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html
[1] https://www.overleaf.com
[2] https://search.ononoki.org/search?q=overleaf+agpl
[3] https://search.ononoki.org/search?q=overleaf+affero
My (animal) predator alert software using camera surveillance is licensed under #AGPLv3
Can I or other people walking in front of the camera, demand a copy of the source code?
Does having your (visual) information processed by the software, count as interacting with the software through the internett?
https://gitlab.com/papiris/predator-detect-and-notify
#AfferoGPL
#AGPLv3Compliance
If we could we'd fork @tokodon, call it something else, make it GlutPlug and compatible with both M'don and Epicyon. At the same time we'd adapt both M'don and Epicyon servers to GlutPlug. We'd give back the non-JS interface to M'don, make the 'Live feeds' timeline the default timeline + EDIT make it I2P-federate.
We'd not show Like and Boost counts on posts without a person opening them. And would enforce #AGPLv3Compliance on very questionable actor, #HellaDoge.
@mjg59 @jenniferplusplus @blogdiva
Do not #Copyleft licences, like #GPLv3, work by ensuring that **any** software that includes the FOSS code be #FOSS also?
What the above describes is #softwareTheft, right?
For example #MastodonDevs by allowing #HellaDoge to not provide source code for years, with a notification of such by us, are allowing software #theft, right?
> Fediverse has NOTHING to do with cryptocurrency
True, but #Mastodon however has been failing to enforce the #AGPLv3Compliance against apparent software thieves at #HellaDogeDotCom.
We have been calling for compliance for a long time now.
Difficult to know for sure whether some #collusion between #memecoin peddlers and a #MastodonDev exists.
Dunno.
> Appears on the scene to take control of fedi at some might say a very sensitive and opportune time,
> Gets a disproportionate amount of funds to develop fedi software,
> continues to not enforce #AGPLv3Compliance against #HellaDoge.com,
> Magically comes to support #antiFeatures like forced #javascript, Explore Tab, showing interaction counts, etc
> #JoinMastodon.com is CloudFlare,
> But says 'no' to #ventureCapital out of #SiliconValley.
Hmm.
@Gargron
@witchescauldron
We need to retain what'll keep Fediverse ethical.
The #infiniteScroll, javascript timeline appears to be forced upon users, with no way to enjoy the previous JS-free interface. This exposes users to #tracking.
To those opposing #Muskrat, mastodon team still don't enforce #copyLeft on a #dogecoin-pumping instance! (See #AGPLv3Compliance)
If a fork is the way forward, back-port security fixes to a version of #Mastodon that doesn't require JS and removing #2FA would be a start.
Lincoln Russell
Boud
projectmoon
Asta [AMP]
papiris🏴🇵🇸
Dick Smiths Fair Go Supporters
Dick Smiths Fair Go Supporters