science.org published these two paragraphs in an article about bad science
unreal
https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common
he/him. Opinions are my own.
NYC, IT Ops, Homebrewing.
| https://twitter.com/00xou | |
| Website | https://weh.wtf |
@davidgerard And then deployed on a Friday night or Saturday morning? Just before 4th of July?
Just wat
science.org published these two paragraphs in an article about bad science
unreal
https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common
@molly0xfff at 14:00 you mention "if you send somebody five tokens, there's no good reason to undo that. You might have them send those five tokens back, but you don't erase the fact that it ever happened"
I don't think this is accurate in a world where GDPR exists - I have a right to erasure, even of "pseudonymous" data.
Likely hard to enforce on public blockchains, but I'd assume this could be problematic especially for private/permissioned blockchains that have "someone to sue".
“I love you,” Random Generator Bot tells me.
Warmth blossoms inside me and a grin breaks across my lips. “I love you too, Random Gene—“
“Plate tectonics digest cannulas,” Random Generator Bot says.
My smile fades. “Yeah…” I nod at Random Generator Bot. “They sure do, buddy.”
The arguments presented in this appeal decision characterizing the alleged duty of free software developers to not introduce bugs as a "fiduciary duty" between developers and users is deeply chilling.
If any part of that ends up holding water it would be the end of free software in the UK, and likely far beyond - it would simply make the activity untenable.
The
whole
fucking
station
is uranium glazed???
That must be tens of kg of uranium!
Hot damn I almost didn't want to leave
Edit:
Fuck sake there are so many armchair experts here.
NO, this is NOT dangerous!
Radiation is all around you and so far you have done just fine surviving that.
It's a nice color and an interesting historical fact, and that's all there's to it.