science.org published these two paragraphs in an article about bad science
unreal
https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common
he/him. Opinions are my own.
NYC, IT Ops, Homebrewing.
| https://twitter.com/00xou | |
| Website | https://weh.wtf |
science.org published these two paragraphs in an article about bad science
unreal
https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common
“I love you,” Random Generator Bot tells me.
Warmth blossoms inside me and a grin breaks across my lips. “I love you too, Random Gene—“
“Plate tectonics digest cannulas,” Random Generator Bot says.
My smile fades. “Yeah…” I nod at Random Generator Bot. “They sure do, buddy.”
The arguments presented in this appeal decision characterizing the alleged duty of free software developers to not introduce bugs as a "fiduciary duty" between developers and users is deeply chilling.
If any part of that ends up holding water it would be the end of free software in the UK, and likely far beyond - it would simply make the activity untenable.
The
whole
fucking
station
is uranium glazed???
That must be tens of kg of uranium!
Hot damn I almost didn't want to leave
Edit:
Fuck sake there are so many armchair experts here.
NO, this is NOT dangerous!
Radiation is all around you and so far you have done just fine surviving that.
It's a nice color and an interesting historical fact, and that's all there's to it.
Elon Musk is really an imbecile, an idiot disguised in the persona of faux-brilliance.
This is not about cutting off an API.
This is about destroying any remaining shred of trust with the developer community. With trust gone, there is only a burning pile of, well, no developers.
He wanted to build an 'everything app.' The idea now is just LOL. What developer would dare to commit any time and effort to someone who has destroyed TRUST.
TRUST is everything. When its gone, it doesn't come back.