@kgf @cambria

"I understand the concern but in my case, the line between human written and AI generated are really blurry." - they don't even realise this is also concern?

"I have very loose views on copyright laws" - yeah, it shows buddy, you're more than happy to integrate the plagiarism machine into your everyday workflow...

thanks for the links for both though!
(now I remember reading something because their avatar is familiar but didn't remember the subject at all)

@ashur BINGO!
like the 1 million satellites plan, it's not realistic at all. it just sounds plausible enough from the distance so it'll attract the hype and the investors.

now that I think about it, it's the same as with LLM / GenAI:
when you don't look closely it appears to be good, but even if you observe it from an average person's viewpoint, the details are blurred and makes no sense.

it seems VC investors only read the headlines of these assholes claims and they just throw money at them 🤷‍♂️

@kgf yeah, it's very easy to rewrite git history to change the message (/ remove a co-author).. I can even imagine a pre-push hook that does it so there's no mistake made by the engineers. (disgusting)

I didn't follow lutris, what happened there?