Analysis of #AmericanSociologicalReview acceptances & rejections 1990-2010. Main finding is those in elite depts more likely to be accepted & less likely to be rejected. Higher rejections for not-White not-male or for gender/race topics are "explained" by elite dept. variable.
https://www.rsfjournal.org/content/8/7/192
Who Gets Accepted and Who Gets Rejected? Status in the Production of Social Science
This article considers science as a stratified social system that may reflect and reproduce broader social patterns of stratification. Analyses are based on a unique data archive with more than ten thousand published and unpublished manuscripts and the associated peer reviews, all submitted between 1990 and 2010 to the American Sociological Review , a leading journal in the discipline. The analysis considers how race, gender, manuscript topic, and institutional affiliation are associated over time with publication decisions. These decisions shape the future of the discipline and have broader social implications. The findings show patterns that may limit emerging perspectives in the discipline and provides recommendations as to how the discipline can not only make the stratification system more permeable, but also emphasizes the significance of flattening the hierarchy altogether.


