MartinKlein

118 Followers
290 Following
333 Posts

Very much enjoyed @Samuelmoore's book 'Publishing Beyond the Market'. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11781635

Somewhat naively I was hoping Sam would present a grand plan for fixing scholarly publishing, but instead Sam makes the interesting point that the idea we need such a plan is itself part of the problem!

Publishing Beyond the Market: Open Access, Care, and the Commons

<I>Publishing Beyond the Market</I> argues that the move to open access should focus less on the free accessibility of research outputs and more on who controls the publications and infrastructures for scholarly communication. By deploying theoretical literature on science and technology studies, care ethics, and the commons, the book critically interrogates open access and reimagines a more ethical future for researcher-led publishing. A case study of Plan S—the multifunder European policy for open access publishing—explores its tendency to rehearse all the failures of commercialisation. Through critical engagement with the open access landscape, the book reveals the shortcomings of market-centric and policy-based approaches to open access book and journal publishing, particularly their tendency to reinforce conservatism, commercialism, and private control of publishing.<BR /><BR /> Going forward, <I>Publishing Beyond the Market</I> explores the importance of collectivity and democratic governance within the transition to open access publishing. It suggests that developing a commons-based, scholar-led publishing landscape through a series of presses that are each managed by working academics could offer a productive counterpoint to marketised systems of open access and subscription publishing. In weaving themselves together in order to "scale small" these publishing initiatives would act as a counter-hegemonic project based on mutual reliance and care. By illustrating how these projects build toward a commons-based publishing future, and how they may complement other approaches to publishing within university presses and libraries, the book culminates in an argument for the infrastructures, policies, and forms of governance needed to nurture such a collective vision.

Open Call for Innovative Uses of COAR Notify

The purpose of this call is to identify potential new use cases for the COAR Notify protocol, through the prototyping of innovative implementations of the protocol for linking, interacting or integrating repository resources with other services or resources.

The grants will be up to 10.000 €

Deadline is the end of day on 2026-01-18

Full details: https://coar-repositories.org/news-updates/open-call-for-innovative-uses-of-coar-notify/

Open Call for Innovative Uses of COAR Notify

The COAR Notify Protocol is a set of profiles, constraints and conventions around the use of W3C Linked Data Notifications (LDN) to integrate repository systems with relevant services in a distribu…

COAR

After 4 years of this blog post being in draft, I’ve just published the initial motivation for working on Linked Data Event Streams #LDES and kept the date at which it was planned to appear: https://pietercolpaert.be/ldes/2021/09/03/ldes

It elaborates on the maintenance hell for APIs and replication hell with dumps, and how we are fighting this status quo with the #SEMIC LDES initiative.

People have very different expectations of what “making services interoperable” actually means. I think we need to make this explicit by talking about 3 different levels: either you just want to promote iop within an app ecosystem (cf. ~ bsky), or you want cross-ecosystem reusability to be possible (cf. ~ activitypub).

https://pietercolpaert.be/interoperability/2025/08/22/levels-of-ambition

Real quick just want to remind you that men's rights do not vary from state to state in America.

Women's rights do.

Take from that what you will.

Submitting something to an #MDPI journal? Maybe think again 👇
http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2025/07/trouble-at-t-review-mill-how-mdpi-lets.html
Trouble at t' (review) mill: How MDPI lets down authors

 I guess many readers will have had peer reviews where the reviewer doesn't appear to have understood, or even properly read, the paper they...

#HBD to arXiv!🎈

On August 14, 1991, the very first paper was submitted to arXiv. That's 34 years of sharing research quickly, freely & openly!

Some baby pictures to show how far we've come . . . when we were just a computer under a desk in 1991. . . & in our 1994 punk phase . . . 👶💾

Give a birthday present to arXiv on our birthday to support #openscience & arXiv for many birthdays to come. 🎁

https://info.arxiv.org/about/donate.html

“Rights of papers are owned by the publishers hence, there is no consent needed from authors”

Straight from Elesevier's own mouth, in a letter sent by a "Customer Experience Champion" in response to Professor Iris Van Rooij's enquiry: Rights of papers are owned by the publishers hence, there is no consent needed from authors. (This is in the context of scholarly papers being fed to their LLM.) Folks, when you send your work to Elsevier journals, you are literally…

http://svpow.com/2025/08/13/rights-of-papers-are-owned-by-the-publishers-hence-there-is-no-consent-needed-from-authors/

“Rights of papers are owned by the publishers hence, there is no consent needed from authors”

Straight from Elesevier’s own mouth, in a letter sent by a “Customer Experience Champion” in response to Professor Iris Van Rooij’s enquiry: Rights of papers are owned by th…

Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week
This conversation made me laugh