399 Followers
781 Following
3.7K Posts
Mostly computer and technical stuff. Radical listener. Tries to be a good person.
#Rust #UA
Githubhttps://github.com/marshray
Bluesky@marshray.bsky.social
Discordmarshray
Emailmarshray & live ! c0m
Twitchhttps://www.twitch.tv/marsh_ray
TypeStatic, strict

RE: https://mastodon.social/@marioguzman/116326493397767894

The Power Mac G3 was a thing of beauty. It was a fashionable and ground breaking design while being unapologetically a computer. It went so far beyond the aesthetics of PC cases of the time to address the functional requirement to be able to open it up and add things to it. This aspect was shared with earlier Power Mac towers but never so beautifully realized as in the Power Mac G3. A truly innovative design and product and a self assured early first step on Apple’s decades long run.

NASA live mission coverage is quoting orbit altitudes in "nautical miles".

What a joke.

@iris_meredith @dpnash @glyph Well no one can, 100% of the time.

Those of us who trained and practiced for many years to attempt to consistently think rigorously are basically a lunatic fringe. It’s not normal human behavior.

Are we having fun yet?

https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28627

Shor's algorithm is possible with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits

Quantum computers have the potential to perform computational tasks beyond the reach of classical machines. A prominent example is Shor's algorithm for integer factorization and discrete logarithms, which is of both fundamental importance and practical relevance to cryptography. However, due to the high overhead of quantum error correction, optimized resource estimates for cryptographically relevant instances of Shor's algorithm require millions of physical qubits. Here, by leveraging advances in high-rate quantum error-correcting codes, efficient logical instruction sets, and circuit design, we show that Shor's algorithm can be executed at cryptographically relevant scales with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits. Increasing the number of physical qubits improves time efficiency by enabling greater parallelism; under plausible assumptions, the runtime for discrete logarithms on the P-256 elliptic curve could be just a few days for a system with 26,000 physical qubits, while the runtime for factoring RSA-2048 integers is one to two orders of magnitude longer. Recent neutral-atom experiments have demonstrated universal fault-tolerant operations below the error-correction threshold, computation on arrays of hundreds of qubits, and trapping arrays with more than 6,000 highly coherent qubits. Although substantial engineering challenges remain, our theoretical analysis indicates that an appropriately designed neutral-atom architecture could support quantum computation at cryptographically relevant scales. More broadly, these results highlight the capability of neutral atoms for fault-tolerant quantum computing with wide-ranging scientific and technological applications.

arXiv.org

@dpnash @iris_meredith @glyph Yes, I am too.

My point is we are not representative.

@iris_meredith @glyph It’s an extremely unpopular idea among the folks I follow, but 85% is officially “good enough” (i.e., a passing grade) for most areas of human endeavor.

So if a few fancy matrix multiplications can do that in two seconds, and do it 24/7 without expecting even basic employment rights, then business will be willing to put up with nearly anything to take advantage of that.

Unfortunately, I fear that it's easy to see why LLMs became popular: getting anywhere in our currently arranged society requires us all to generate unreasonably large quantities of what is, frankly, total crap.

RE: https://mastodon.online/@mastodonmigration/116312883173526888

About 10 days ago Bluesky proudly announced it got 100m investment, largely from cryptobros:
https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/19/bluesky-announces-100m-series-b-after-ceo-transition/

Today they are proudly announcing an "AI product" that relies on scraping your posts.

#Bluesky #AI

@archaeohistories What happened to this account?

Another day, another of the little one's things repaired with a hot air tool and a bit of poking.

So many people assume broken plastic is unrepairable garbage because it's hard to glue.

But if it's a thermoplastic, as almost all mass market plastic goods are, all you need to do is gently heat up the pieces until they soften and push them back together to form a solid weld. Filler rod can help in some cases but isn't always necessary or useful depending on the nature of the repair, for flat surfaces I've had decent results just using a screwdriver to lightly press the heat affected zones into each other until they merge.