Jason Skiles

0 Followers
42 Following
56 Posts
Not famous and not trying to be. Ordinary guy just here to read interesting people.
Apparently they didn’t even let Tucker Carlson record a final episode to wrap up plot lines and now we’ll never know if they caught those pooping Gypsies

I am seldom overtly political here, but I want to say a thing out loud.

A right to bodily autonomy isn't conditioned on being a rape or incest survivor. We must not create special circumstances when we recognize a woman's right to avail herself of family planning services or medical care.

It's her body. The decisions are hers, in consultation she takes with her doctor, and influenced, to the extent she elects, by her partner.

That's it.

Identical philosophy applies to trans folks.

Lighter tweeting today as I amend university forms to disclose my selling grades to my students. Apologies for the innocent oversight.

A few days ago, few people across the country knew the names Justin Jones or Justin Pearson. Nor did we give the TN legislature a second thought.

Now both men are re-energized, to a new level, with national attention — and Tennessee’s many sins are now under scrutiny.

Nice job.

Well, I am a criminal defense attorney.
Is Donald Trump Guilty? It May Be Up To A Jury, Experts Say

Whittier College made some of the most absolutely mind-blowingly bumptious defamation threats against a client that I’ve seen in my career. So I wrote about it.*

*nothing I do online is the fault of my firm or clients

https://popehat.substack.com/p/berating-the-bumptious-whittier-colleges

Berating The Bumptious: Whittier College’s Extraordinary Threat Letters

Seriously, Though, Don’t Write Letters Like This

The Popehat Report
Literally swiping money from charities. Just straight up evil villain shit.
Follow-up: Dean Martinez writes an excellent letter in response to the Judge Duncan fiasco https://popehat.substack.com/p/stanford-law-responds-appropriately
Stanford Law Responds Appropriately, If Belatedly, To Judge Duncan Fiasco

Measured Decisions Rarely Please Anyone

The Popehat Report

https://apnews.com/article/proud-boys-enrique-tarrio-capitol-riot-informant-ce0a1cf20c17c95b1ea3306fb70d93c4

@Popehat At what point does a prosecutor have an ethical obligation to inform the defense that one of their witnesses is an informant? Was it okay for them to sit on that since December? Were they obligated to reveal it at all?

Federal prosecutors reveal Proud Boys witness was informant

A lawyer for one of the former Proud Boys leaders charged with seditious conspiracy says federal prosecutors have revealed that a defense witness was secretly acting as a government informant for nearly two years after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Defense attorney Carmen Hernandez on Wednesday asked a judge to schedule an emergency hearing so the defense can learn more about the prosecutors' use of the informant. The judge ordered prosecutors to file a response to the defense filing by Thursday afternoon and scheduled a hearing for the same day, putting testimony in the case on hold until Friday. The U.S. attorney’s office did not immediately comment on the filing.

AP News