I can’t help it, I somehow feel gaslighted by the whole #GenAI debate. People who are critical of GenAI are often told “but when done right, you’re just so much more productive, so obviously you just didn’t to it right.” So I’m trying. Not because I feel I need to, but because I just want to get a realistic impression of the capabilities, and be able to discuss these with my students.

Then fancy-pants Claude 4 with extended thinking spits out this line: 1/

Evästyttääkö?

"... Yliopiston Apteekki on käyttänyt verkkoapteekissaan evästeitä ja muita seurantateknologioita niin, että reseptilääkkeisiin ja itsehoitolääkkeisiin liittyviä asiointitietoja on välittynyt esimerkiksi Googlelle ja Metalle."

#YliopistonApteekki #tietosuoja

https://yle.fi/a/74-20165663

Fediverse - ja taisi olla Mastodonkin - mainittu:

https://www.uusijuttu.fi/juttu/sRHvh7eL-mXQ5CeHi-4140c

„LLMs are not the AI we need to address climate change; they are the AI we would use if we wanted to risk serious harm to the climate. Clarifying the difference between the two is critical. (...) Chatbots and movie synthesis machines (perhaps the most energetically costly systems) are fun, maybe even amazing - but I don’t think we should be risking our planet for them.”

https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/eric-schmidts-risky-bet-on-ai-and

I discovered Gary Marcus' substack today, and it's really worth a read.