| Website | https://kevinjardine.dev |
| Posters | https://gruze.org/posters_2024 |
| Tip Jar | https://tiptopjar.com/kevinjardine |
| RedBubble shop | https://www.redbubble.com/people/Galaxy-Map/shop?asc=u |
| Website | https://kevinjardine.dev |
| Posters | https://gruze.org/posters_2024 |
| Tip Jar | https://tiptopjar.com/kevinjardine |
| RedBubble shop | https://www.redbubble.com/people/Galaxy-Map/shop?asc=u |
I'm continuing to tweak my model of the Milky Way based on catalogs of objects in or near the galactic plane. I found a great molecular cloud catalog described in a 2017 paper.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834...57M/abstract
Although distance estimates derived from gas velocity are not as reliable as parallax, we are still dependent on them because there are very few maser parallax measurements from the southern hemisphere.
This shows the molecular cloud data and my model out to 12 kpc. Galactic centre down.
Just for fun, here is the above image with my two-armed model of the Milky Way: Carina arm (green) and Norma arm (blue).
Of course there is no consensus on the structure of the Milky Way so this is just my model.
One of the best ways to map the Milky Way is to combine multiple data sets covering different parts of the galactic plane.
This image has masers (blue), estimated bar and ring positions, a new catalog of about 500 HII regions with Gaia-derived distances (red), star density from a new OB star catalog and part of figure 6 from the OB star paper showing individual stars with low error distances.
The dashed line shows a circle with radius 6 kpc. Almost all Gaia data in the galactic plane appears within this circle. Orange is the inner ring, red the bar, and blue the two spiral arms. I sometimes call this a fiddler crab model since one arm is much larger than the other. (Image: NOAA)
As always I should note that there is no consensus on the structure of the Milky Way. This is my personal model.