Here's your irregular reminder that:

Twitter was a multi-billion dollar company with thousands of employees.

Mastodon is a niche hobbyist product run by volunteers

The fact that we're being seen as a viable alternative to them is an admission that a federated, decentralized future is not only possible, but desirable.

Mastodon is not one thing, or one place. It's a network of many things and many places. We don't have a spokesperson (I mean, there's me. I'm the official spokesperson for 💯 of the fediverse, but beyond me there is no spokesperson) we don't have consensus on moderation or blocking or tools or what is good and what is bad. Some of us are professional SREs and Sysadmins, some of us aren't. Some of our instances have been around for 5+ years, some won't be here in six months.

And that's good! All of it, every last bit of it is good.

We're wrestling power away from the billionaire class, in real time, and reclaiming it for the People.

Do watch this to the end

#Qatar #LGBTQ #football #worldcup

The penny is dropping for more and more people: Brexit has made us poorer

We need to immediately take steps to build a closer relationship with the EU

As part of our journey back to full membership

#RejoinEU

THE QUESTION every journalist should be asking right now is why the hell should ordinary workers have to pay to fill a massive £30bn black hole blown in the country’s finances by the Conservative Governments gross incompetence, negligence & ineptitude!!

https://youtu.be/WrDtNQjZMAE

The collapse of Twitter for (basically) self-inflicted reasons makes a strong case for building online infrastructure structured as a non-profit or public utility.

People rely on these platforms for public information, use them for democratic debate and many invest their livelihoods in them.

These platforms are too important to public safety, peoples’ livelihoods and democracy to leave in the hands of eccentric billionaires or the whims of stock markets.