@exactocrat

1 Followers
520 Following
39 Posts
@MonaApp Lol. Sad to see that missing features take a backseat to AI + pricing shellgames.
@MonaApp In this version do you finally implement drag-to-reorder themes functionality?? It's a themes-centric app -- the lack of this functionality is glaring.
@MonaApp In this version have you added--finally?!--'drag to reorder' functionality -- for the lists of themes?
@Iconfactory @Iconfactory Mac features a separate IAP?? Come on! I appreciate some details here (such as non-sub pricing). But this, overall, feels like bait n switch. I wouldn't have purchased the iOS IAP had I known that, a year later, there suddenly becomes a macOS IAP. Suit yourself, folks, but I expect to not buy Iconfactory products anymore.
@sindresorhus One key detail: TextSniper allows for many past versions of macOS, including some that are much less bad than the one singular release that this latest app of yours supports.
@joshzepeda @chojubo @richallum @flexibits Ditto!

@natejung @ryanashcraft 'Log Food failed because Shortcuts couldn't convert from Text to Food Details.'

One example of an app that gets this 'conversion' thing right is @chronicling .

@natejung @ryanashcraft For me, it's not a matter of there being many options or few. The actions that I care about are 'log food' and 'log meal' -- I would like for these actions to accept text vars denoting food name, food amount, datetime. The last time I checked, those actions aren't quite so flexible. I hope Ryan will enhance the automation functionality -- this is a feature that Cronometer will never provide.
@natejung @ryanashcraft I, for years, have been wanting to see Foodnoms gain better Shortcuts functionality -- e.g., create a text var and send it as input (a food name) to Foodnoms. I use Cronometer. And I hate it! If Foodnoms were to gain good Shortcuts support for logging foods (not for just launching the app) I'd subscribe and I'd switch.
@metaning Lists seen in the Settings > 'Appearance & Themes' screen. In my eyes, themes not being reorderable may well qualify as a lack of basic functionality. Leaves a bad impression when basic functionality goes overlooked for a long, long time. I hope that things will improve!