@ltlnx The granular approach seems novel. But the "dimensions" and "qualifiers" are rather arbitrary and vague, unlike Creative Commons, which is about a list of concrete, contractually defined actions that people can do.

It starts with "'I used AI' doesn't tell you anything. Spell-check?" as the problem that it aims to solve, but then, in the actual specification, says that it "deliberately doesn't define" whether spellcheck counts as AI.

@ellick_taiwan 跟寫其他東西的感覺好像也沒什麼不一樣。我一直覺得人類所有的創作都像「雕像本來就在石頭裡面」（當然，本來就存在詩的也有很多爛詩，就像人找到的天然風景也不全是美景）。但是這種感覺在限制越多的體裁越是明顯。很多東西如果不是因為為了要押韻、對仗，根本就不可能想到可以那樣寫。甚至我想到搞不好有一種占卜的方法是：隨機抽一個韻腳，自己寫一首詩，詩的內容就是占卜結果。

不過如果要說動機的話，大概是像我在第一篇裡面說的，完全不會作詩，感覺自己好像太無知，所以想練習一下。這樣至少能稍微對韻目、平仄有印象。