@wordshaper the argument seems to be that if you use the infinite intern to _generate_ all that code, you can just make it _maintain_ it all, too.
Or because it doesn't suffer the biological weaknesses of humans, like the need to eat sleep or have a life, just make it rewrite it every now and again. Because its memory is perfect, it never gets distracted, and it can do a better job than we can, anyway.
Because, like, nothing like this has ever been tried before and hasn't been shown not to work before, either. Like CASE tools or graphical programming or whatever. Those never happened, those don't exist, what are you talking about...do you feel ok?
(Obviously the last two paragraphs are sarcasm.)
In fairness, I do think there could be an analogy to compilers. They were controversial for a time, too. But they got better, and even though we find bugs in them (at varying frequency), they're pretty much ubiquitous. Yes, some have to program in assembler occasionally out of necessity, and some do it just for fun, but it's not the norm for most professional development anymore.