GitHub | https://github.com/charmitro |
Blog | https://blog.charmitro.gr/ |
Today Tuta Turns Ten! 🥳🎉
Win 10 years of Tuta Legend worth 960€ 🎁
To enter 👇
➡️ Follow @Tutanota
➡️ Like & Boost
➡️ Reply to this post inviting two friends to Tuta
#Contest ends March 28, 2024
Read more on where we started and where we are going: https://tuta.com/blog/road-to-success
@nixCraft Doesn't seem unlikely, and while liking the money, I am dreading having to clean up the mess.
I honestly haven't been impressed at all with AI code, it can only do what's already been done, and even then it just apes it.
10x pay to clean up two years of AI-written mess? Hell, no. Not worth it.
@nixCraft Slightly extreme numbers both way.
Good programmers are going to be more hard to find, because people coming up on vibe coding are going to struggle.
@nixCraft I'm senior dev on my project. I've 30+ years in the industry and looking after a bunch of fresh graduate developers.
I spend my days cleaning up AI slop from their code #facepalm
I recently had one developer "fix" a non fatal error filling up the log files... .... by commenting out the line that wrote to the logs.
I yearn for my retirement in 10 years.
Me, last week...
https://ruby.social/@gnoll110/114187965449790749
That prediction is not even close. Right now when I ask an AI to write a powershell script that does X, it will come up with something using commandlets that don’t actually exist. You can’t debug code that is made from the magical land of Peter Pan, where everything you imagine becomes reality.
I always end up writing the script myself from scratch.
Even if AI-written code is great and golden, there is no way we can use it for secure or critical applications unless a human understands every single line and all the interactions.
The hours to audit all that are comparable to the hours it would take to write it manually in the first place.
Totally agree with him.
I noticed he works for Google too! That says a lot.
@nixCraft If you are the type of coder that copies code from stackoverflow, AI just might be able to do your job. That's basically what it does and then a bit more.
I tried the public chat ones to do a couple things. I needed to copy/paste some C++ code into Python and convert it. Had to talk to the same hardware. The AI did wonderfully.
It couldn't make a C++03 TMP thing to create the fizzbuzz string--but it would have convinced some. It guessed about what my code does when asked.
@nixCraft The last one was actually interesting because it got more and more wrong the more in depth I wanted it described. At the upper level it got it quite accurate. Was able to say what the resulting variable could do. But when asked HOW that was done it went into hypotheticals and got them all wrong.
From what I've read, which isn't much, these things just don't understand context at all. They don't understand the languages they speak. My tests rather confirmed this.