I don't like a movie that treats supporting characters' (or extras') lives like a prop.
Freevolt
@freevolt24
- 52 Followers
- 5 Following
- 1.6K Posts
Although I'm still doubtful if "suicide" should be a straight-out taboo (both discussing it and doing it), but since we already have all sort of social mechanism to make it stop, I think their focus should be "disabling the reason to die" rather than "enabling the reason to live" because, like I said, "will to live" is a default mode of consciousness. By depriving oneself of the reason against it, I assume a conscious mind wouldn't even want to gravitate toward that idea.
"Will to live" is the default mode of consciousness. I assume you need both a good reason and courage to go against it.
Consciousness is a curse. The only thing you can do is to make it better, unless you have finalized the reason to end it and have the courage to execute it.
How do you think about a person whose catchphrases are "People are idiots," "I don't care," and "Yes/I know, but" ?
A sure sign of toxicity is accusing *anybody* just because they can't understand people. They might as well not even try to understand people.
Is it because I think only my professional side is respected? Or because I can't or won't get close to many people at a personal level? (=distancing)
On the other hand, who's "me" in this context? Loosely speaking, everything is my "ability" rather than myself: my professional quality, my appearance, my personality, my traits, ... Why do I feel neglected when I kind of know some part of my sides are respected?