Sometimes my spouse & I enjoy these conversation-starter cards intended for newer couples. Last night we drew "WHAT IS YOUR WILDEST FANTASY?"
I went first. Described an economic & political landscape where innovation might accelerate while increasing synergy between communities of interest & positive localism.
Then it was her turn. She looked at me, took a breath & theorized re: improving animal welfare policy, clarifying distinctions relative to liberation.
Glad to have found my person.
Law review submission is one of those deals where "everyone" knows it's broken, but the power paradigm forces folks to play the game. Kind of like, y'know, most of law.
I honestly believe the revolution is coming, not because that situation is independently absurd but because generally MOOC and related models for online learning are going to experience an AI-facilitated renaissance. Law comes right after CompSci and accounting in ease of adaptation.. and resulting contraction in academia.
Trying to figure out how to convince the rod and gun club to let me cut a hole in the basement ceiling.
It's the only indoor archery range for miles but my recurve setup is too tall.. everyone else is thinking about deer season but I'm thinking about my first Vegas Shoot in March...
@dkluft I don't see why uploading to AI robot would be any different than sending to a client's Gmail account or anywhere else it could be parsed, and suspect the informed consent barrier here is therefore quite low, basic engagement letter stuff.. not because it should be, but because the contemporary "reasonable lawyer" lacks appropriate tech competence.
But then, I have the luxury of being out of practice. Curious to see where the mainstream goes.
@ScholasticaLawReviews Have y'all ever considered allowing authors to opt out of the 5-day rejection scheduling delay (when journals so elect)?
If it's truly intended to be a courtesy, giving stakeholders autonomy seems like a natural piece of the thing.
