Great idea! Now one for the GNOME desktop 😊!
Scott Trakker
@Scott_Trakker@mastodon.world
- 13 Followers
- 46 Following
- 227 Posts
@alatiera: didn't you ask for feedback on the move to Wayland only? Maybe get in contact with the people of KiCad?
I do understand what you mean, but like you have Silverblue as an alternative to Workstation, I was expecting a bootc variant of Fedora Server.
And how will this be presented on the Fedora website? Something like: for Fedora server you can choose between Fedora Server and Fedora bootc?
"What would a Fedora Server have that current bootc images don't?"
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. As far as I know there isn't yet a bootc variant of Fedora Server or is there?
Will there be two versions of Fedora Server: one package based and one with bootc? Like the current situation of Fedora Workstation and Fedora Silverblue?
I was wondering: will there be a bootc variant of Fedora Server or will Fedora CoreOs take that role?
Has it already been decided how packages can be added to the base image in bootc? Or in other words: what mechanism will replace the overlay package in rpm-ostree?
Thanks! I upgraded to version 1.4.2!
Ah, so this is more a UX-design issue in GTK and should be addressed there?
I have followed your work for the last couple of years (by your blog posts, messages, etc). Thank you very much for all that you have done for the GNOME desktop!!
I'm not sure what you mean, but one rule in UX-design is that try to minimise the number of horizontal en vertical lines. When you align everything to the left side, you have one vertical line. In the current design there are five. This way the person who uses the app has to scan the text more, to find out what is on the screen and where things start. If you add a bit more padding to the top of the word Profiles and Containers, it's even more clear that these are category names.
Thanks for asking!
I will follow that thread!