It’s official: There are now 3,000 protests planned for No Kings Day.
That means there will be more protests on March 28 than any previous day in American history.
Please join us: https://www.nokings.org/?SQF_SOURCE=indivisible #NoKings
Single dad with three kids, trying to get by, without losing touch with what's important. Google Certified Innovator & Professional Workspace Administrator
Malmö, Sweden
WhereToFind.me/@NoSubstitute
There is No Substitute!
| WhereToFindMe | https://wheretofind.me/@NoSubstitute |
| Keyoxide | https://keyoxide.org/84A94C18F68F97DC3709E5057B294EAD4F52CAAA |
It’s official: There are now 3,000 protests planned for No Kings Day.
That means there will be more protests on March 28 than any previous day in American history.
Please join us: https://www.nokings.org/?SQF_SOURCE=indivisible #NoKings
⚖️ Gjovik v Apple update:
There is now a case schedule, June 2026 dual summary judgement hearing, & Oct 2026 jury trial date for my whistleblower & labor retaliation lawsuit against Apple; & I also got approval to file a motion for preliminary injunction asking the court to order Apple to put me back on payroll prior to the trial! There is light at the end of this very long, dark tunnel. 💫
Case schedule: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.417952/gov.uscourts.cand.417952.274.0.pdf
Minutes: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.417952/gov.uscourts.cand.417952.273.0.pdf
Docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67772913/gjovik-v-apple-inc/?page=2
I'm hopefully getting my whistleblower retaliation lawsuit unstayed in a week or two, & Apple's apparently panicking.
A couple days ago, Apple's lawyers tried to add another 2 month+ delay to that lawsuit, via vague informal emails to court staff & without filing anything to the docket or judge.
& it almost worked!
They're a bunch of smooth criminals.
The hearing for Apple's motion is today. The court did agree to record it because I said I need evidence of what Apple says, since they're asking to have me sanctioned due to me filing an NLRB charge against Apple, and that's illegal. The hearing isn't public; pray for me, y'all.
Hearing update: The Judge denied Apple's requests for sanctions. We are going to enter a protective order, but the Judge said Apple can't use it the way Apple wanted to use it. Overall, we made some progress.
In my lawsuit, Apple still has not explained why it fired me, and their amended answer still did not provide facts to support their defenses.
At midnight on a long weekend, the Court denied my motion to strike & said I CAN'T argue its illegal to retaliate against someone reporting issues to the government.
My claims were investigated by the gov, found to have merit, and multiple enforcement actions were undertaken. The court completely ignored these facts and does not even address them.
I pointed out that my claims were investigated by gov, found to have merit, & enforcement actions were taken
The court completely ignored these facts and does not even address them & said I should cite unrelated cases
This is beyond frustrating. Things he said I didn't raise until my Reply were expressly raised in the Motion, or raised by Apple's Opp. This is the same thing he did when he claimed I "conceded" on things I expressly objected He also denied my request for a motion hearing again