#OpenAccess #AcademicPublishing #HigherEd #Science: "In Latin America, scientific outputs are considered a public good. Free-to-publish and free-to-read cooperative publishing is supported by non-commercial and publicly funded infrastructure. Ninety-five per cent of Latin American journals are diamond open access: community-driven and collaborative platforms with no article processing charges. Their example shows us that research is a more global and diverse enterprise than is typically acknowledged. By including diverse voices, they contribute substantially to the academic landscape and the accessibility and dissemination of research3. Unfortunately, these journals tend to be excluded by indexing systems, which causes science published outside of the Global North to not receive the attention that it deserves.
Academic institutions globally should support open access through not-for-profit, sustainable, collaborative, scholarly led publishing4. Social impact should be the driving force behind science, and research should be open and aligned with the UNās sustainable development agenda5.
In addition, the research assessment system must evolve to recognize the intrinsic value of research rather than the prestige of the journal in which it is published6. Some initiatives, such as Plan S, are encouraging a shift in publishing practices. However, Plan S falls short in addressing the core issues of traditional scholarly publishing7 ā namely, the unequal distribution of articles among a small number of commercial publishers with exorbitant profit margins8. The continued move towards article-processing-charge models could result in a worldwide pay-to-publish system, and make it challenging for researchers from developing nations to disseminate their research9.
Finally, communication practices for scientific disciplines may differ but we should all make a firm commitment to multilingualism in scholarly communications."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01637-2