Nicolas Galtier

@GaltierNicolas@ecoevo.social
303 Followers
289 Following
194 Posts
molecular evolution and population genomics at ISEM (CNRS - Univ Montpellier - IRD)
@gvwilson
Everybody is aware about what peer-reviewing is: two persons having, more or less professionally, validated a scientific document. No more, no less.
And yes, posts on social networks often do more buzz that peer-reviewed papers, so what?
@gvwilson
I've read this carefully, and, I disagree a lot. A million things have changed in the way science works since the 1950's; to blame peer-reviewing appears arbitrary. Bibliometry-based evaluation, journal esteem hierarchy, merchandizing of scientific knowledge, oligopoly of big publishers are much more plausible causes of our systemic problems.

Did you know the Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (SORTEE) is also on LinkedIn?

We keep our LinkedIn profile updated and are trying to reach more people. Check us out at: https://linkedin.com/company/sortee/
#openscience

SORTEE | LinkedIn

SORTEE | 1,520 followers on LinkedIn. Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE). | SORTEE is a service organization which brings together researchers working to improve reliability and transparency through cultural and institutional changes in ecology, evolutionary biology, and related fields broadly defined. Anyone interested in improving research in these disciplines is welcome to join, regardless of experience. The society is international in scope, membership, and objectives.

3/3 This is our ⭐️91st⭐️recommendation! We will continue to transparently peer-review your manuscripts and make them free to publish / free to read pieces of citable academic work! Try us, this is the way to go in 2024 ! #OpenScience #openaccess
@NaturalSelection
Nice, thanks!
What is the existing evidence for (1) the genome shock hypothesis and (2) the aridity hypothesis?
@alxsim because doing posters is boring?
Using a theoretical model, we show that the strength of gBGC should be under weak stabilising selection around an evolutionary optimum. We then provide in depth characterization of the evolutionary parameters that influence the optimal value of gBGC and the strength of selection around it. Surprisingly, we reveal that despite a deleterious effect for the population, gBGC is still beneficial to individuals, which might explain its high prevalence in eukaryotes. (2/2)

Hi everybody,

I am pleased to share with you my latest work in collaboration with Augustin Cléssin and Nicolas Lartillot:

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.21.600052v1

GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) is a process that distorts the segregation of heterozygous AT:GC polymorphisms during meiotic #recombination. This genome-wide non-Mendelian segregation has been shown to be a major source of #genetic load, earning the nickname of “Achille’s heel” of #genomes. (1/2)

#PopGen
#Evolution

Does Effective Population Size Govern Evolutionary Differences in Telomere Length? https://buff.ly/3VGpqFO #science #evolution #biology #genome #evolgen_paper
Does Effective Population Size Govern Evolutionary Differences in Telomere Length?

Abstract. Lengths of telomeres vary by an order of magnitude across mammalian species. Similarly, age- and sex-standardized telomere lengths differ by up t

OUP Academic
Updated preprint of momentous review of arthropod moulting led by Giulia Campli and @rmwaterhouse: https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/6538/ #EvoDevo #ArthropodEvolution #arthropod #molting #moulting #ecoevorxiv
The moulting arthropod: a complete genetic toolkit review