6 Followers
100 Following
70 Posts
Cultural sociologist, researcher & Emacs dilettante. Lecturing sociology & research methods. Hacking on Emacs to hone my note-taking system. Toots in Dutch & English.
Githubhttps://github.com/efls
Professional sitehttps://www.eliasstorms.net
🇧🇪

After months of digging and reporting, we have learned where Facebook's bizarre AI spam (like "Shrimp Jesus") comes from, who is making it, how it works, and how it is monetized.

Turns out Meta is directly paying people to spam FB with this stuff

https://www.404media.co/where-facebooks-ai-slop-comes-from/

Where Facebook's AI Slop Comes From

Facebook itself is paying creators in India, Vietnam, and the Philippines for bizarre AI spam that they are learning to make from YouTube influencers and guides sold on Telegram.

404 Media
When I first read the word 'gubernational' and realised it wasn't a spelling mistake, I thought it must be a joke, a word used by people to mock 'teh gobernement' or something. Reading up on VP pick Tim Walz I'm reminded that it is a 'serious word', although it does seem to irk journalists (and has -- of course -- some Latin origins): https://www.npr.org/2019/11/15/779603330/where-does-the-term-gubernatorial-come-from
Educators and anyone working with youth, have you heard about the playful #DigitalLiteracy intervention "Everywhere, All the Time"? Discover how to use it to foster conversations among teens about tech, AI, and their impacts. 🤖 Find out more: https://theglassroom.org/youth/everywhere-all-the-time/
Everywhere, All the Time: a playful exhibition for teens about AI

“Everywhere, All the Time” is a creative and playful digital literacy intervention for youth. Developed by Tactical Tech's youth initiative What the Future Wants, this learning experience equips educators, librarians and anyone working with youth aged 13-19 with a set of engaging and innovative digital literacy resources and methods that can be used in both formal and informal learning environments.

@robin

I really hope that the idea that tech companies can be ethical "from within" without any enforcing "from without", is something that will be considered politically naive by future historians (as naive as current sociologists deem Comte's political ideas).

@robin

The vision (and danger) of a technologists' technocracy, with as its simplest argument that "technologists and scientists know best", has a long history. It reminds me of Auguste Comte, the 19th century scientist who coined the term "sociology" yet also envisioned a parliament populated engineers & scientists who would be able to organize society on a rational basis.

Stimulating read by @robin with some great points on how talk about ethics without considering power imbalances is not just meaningless but also dangerously naive.
The first couple of paragraphs might seem a bit disjointed, but there are some crucial insights here. Sprinkling "ethics" on top of any initiative or organisation is meaningless if there is no counter-power involved, power that should ultimately be based on democratic politics.

https://berjon.com/ethicswishing/

Ethicswishing

People mean well but ethics is hard. In tech, we have a knack for applying ethics in the most useless ways possible — even when we earnestly want to improve humankind's lot. Why does this matter, why are we failing, and how can we fix it?

Robin Berjon
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Vidjagames

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Vidjagames

My #emacs uptime is now over 30 days -- no big deal, but it indicates that my configuration is finally sort of stable: I'm using Emacs for extended periods of time without the continuous tinkering I often lost myself in previously.
LLMs do not reason or apply logic. They manipulate text and form.