Daniel Suarez

@DanielSuarez
1,004 Followers
128 Following
631 Posts
Author of high-tech / sci-fi thrillers: Daemon & Freedom™, Kill Decision, Influx, Change Agent, Delta-v & Critical Mass (Δv Book 2). 

Websitehttps://daniel-suarez.com

(4/4)

2) 'One Step from Skynet'

Nick Milani masterfully explores the inability of generative AI to comprehend the consequences of its actions, and how close we already are to an inadvertent Skynet scenario: https://nickjmilani.substack.com/p/one-step-from-skynet

* I urge you to take a moment to read these essays. It's well worth your time!

One step from Skynet

Why all the fuss about some chatbots?

Nick's Substack

(3/4)
This week, for example I read two excellent Substack articles addressing the dangers of combining AI with drone warfare:

1) 'The Moral Weight of a Kill Decision: Why AI in Warfare Demands a Human in the Loop'

Michael Lubrano, an Iraq combat veteran who now works in AI tech, lays out why human decision-making in war is crucial to accountability:

https://illiteratepoet.substack.com/p/the-moral-weight-of-a-kill-decision

The Moral Weight of a Kill Decision: Why AI in Warfare Demands a Human in the Loop

Because 'Move Fast and Break Things' Is a Terrible Policy for the Geneva Convention

Michael Lubrano
(2/4)
Recently, I've seen some encouraging news -- more and more people and tech companies are refusing to cross that line, instead demanding a human remain in the loop when it comes to decisions about lethal force.

Yes, Let's Keep a 'Human in the Loop'...

Hi All! If you've read my techno-thriller KILL DECISION (2012) or my posts over the past 14 years, it will come as no surprise that I'm against the deployment of autonomous robotic weapons. We've all seen how cheap, remotely piloted kamikaze drones have transformed the modern battlefield. Yet, AI-controlled weapons would make it much worse. As I've stated in my TED Talk from 2013, we must not deploy AI weapons capable of making a 'kill decision'.
(1/4)

If there is going to be a talking filibuster over the save act, the Dems need to read Epstein files that mention Trump into the record for the entire time.

#USPolitics #EpsteinFiles #filibuster

Underappreciated story: Trump and Bondi have decided to disregard the constitutional requirement that US Attorneys require Senate confirmation. In state after state they install unqualified apparatchiks, and it's up to the courts to discover that these stooges are serving illegally.

Which the courts have done, again and again. But the Trump regime simply ignores the courts and the law. All the work of these US Attorneys' offices is at risk. (1/2)

AI Job Loss Research Ignores How AI Is Utterly Destroying the Internet

Widely cited AI labor research ignores the most important thing AI is doing: Killing the human internet.

404 Media
Top U.S. counterterrorism official resigns, says "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation"

Joe Kent, the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, announced his resignation on Tuesday over the Middle East conflict, saying "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation." CBS News' Olivia Rinaldi has the latest.

Be clear about this outrage: Trump and Republicans are attempting in broad daylight to disenfranchise 21 million American voters.

If they want to require a certain kind of ID for voting, they must first provide all eligible voters with that ID. They are making no attempt to do that. It's a Voter Disenfranchisement bill.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/17/us/politics/trump-voter-id-bill.html?smid=url-share

What’s in Trump’s SAVE Act, the Voter ID Bill Republicans Are Pushing?

The legislation would require voters to prove their citizenship in person upon registration, ban IDs without a photo at polling places and criminalize failures to enforce such requirements.

The New York Times