6 thought provoking questions posed to @awaisaftab (psychiatrist) and myself (brain researcher) and we hit on so much:
The challenge of escaping reductionism. Theories of consciousness. Are mental disorders brain disorders? Why should anyone care about philosophy? Is epistemic iteration is failing? And what bits of brain research are awaiting their Copernican moment?
With nods to @summerfieldlab, @knutson_brain, @tyrell_turing, @Neurograce, @eikofried and so many more.
Read it all here (and let's discuss)!
https://awaisaftab.substack.com/p/advancing-neuroscientific-understanding
#McLeanHospital #NIDAnews #noiseassignal #fMRI #connectivity #restingstate
Check it out! Dr. Cole Korponay just uploaded a preprint of our new paper with Dr. Amy Janes. This is a really intriguing finding that seems to have been hiding in plain sight in pretty much every dataset we’ve looked at so far…
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.08.556939v1
/1
Don't miss this one ⤵️. A wide-ranging and provocative conversation covering disparate issues like: How do we balance accuracy versus breadth as scientists? Why should we read a book written in 1897? When is a paw a hand? And should scientists cede the term "dopamine" to the pop-psychologists?
Exactly the type of thing I love about the furry elephant.
On jargon - is it useful? Is it necessary and useful for scientists to say "mnemonic" to refer to "memory" and "affect" to talk about "emotion"? In other words, given that everyone understand emotion and mood and no one really understands what "affect" is until you are really deep into things, why is the term affect useful and important at all? And should we reserve it for deep dives (as opposed to public facing websites and such)? And does anyone call themselves an "emotion researcher?" or a "mood researcher?" @PessoaBrain @[email protected]
Years ago I made a brief twitter thread about it. Can easily be verified by reading the acknowledgment section of Hubel and Wiesel’s papers in the 60s. Take for example their most cited paper, from 1962 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1359523/
Here, “technical assistance” is doing a lot of work. The pattern repeats in most if not all papers. In modern times likely all these women would have been first and middle authors. The result is they were denied credit to contemporary eyes.
#neuroscience
Description:Quality control (QC) has long been an important part of FMRI processing, but it is typically underreported and too often underappreciated, whether for small or large, public or local datasets. This project aims to showcase examples of QC practices across institutions and to foster discussions within the field. Here, we welcome researchers and developers across the globe to describe their QC methods in detail and to show them