1 Followers
10 Following
63 Posts
Profile Picture Credit: Jesse Martin ([email protected])
Profile Picture Alt Text: A person with dark shoulder-length hair partially covered by a blue hoodie with greenish-grayish forms on it meant to look like landforms on a hoodie made out of the Earth. Surrounding the person are small spherical planets with a similar design as the hoodie but of different sizes and with different landforms. The background is primarily black with little white dots meant to look like stars in outer space.
Pronounsany

Texas will execute Robert Roberson on October 17 for a crime that never happened, based on discredited pseudo-science, and ignoring Texas' "junk science law" meant to prevent such use of flawed forensics and miscarriages of justice

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/17/robert-roberson-texas-death-penalty-john-grisham-innocent

https://undark.org/2024/08/06/texas-junk-science-law-not-keeping-up-with-science

#innocenceproject #deathpenalty #Texas #RobertRoberson #autistic #humanrights #capitalpunishment #TexasDefenderService #psuedoscience #junkscience #law #murder #crime #justice #execution

John Grisham on death row prisoner: ‘Texas is about to execute innocent man’

‘There was no crime,’ says author about Robert Roberson who was convicted of murder based on discredited science

The Guardian

@igd_news Love the nice little tidbits they drop at the end: “Some online have claimed that to rationalize his actions, Bushnell must have been mentally unstable. The history of self-immolation does not necessarily support that claim. According to Time magazine, self-immolation as an act of protest dates back centuries, as far back as an old Hindu practice of ritual suicide called sati and Catholic persecution during the Roman Empire. It was brought to international attention when photojournalist Malcolm Browne captured the Buddhist monk Thich Quang Duc while he was actively burning in 1963. In the years that followed, several American citizens set themselves on fire to protest the Vietnam War. More recently, Tunisian street vendor Mohamed Bouazizi's self-immolation in 2010 directly started the Tunisian Revolution and is credited as one of the main causes of the Arab Spring. In the United States, multiple people have self-immolated to protest inaction against climate change, first in 2018, then in 2020, then in 2022. Bushnell became the second American to do so in protest of Israeli military action in Gaza, following an unidentified person who self-immolated outside the Israeli consulate in Atlanta on Dec. 1, 2023.”

Fascists will be fascist, do not let them denigrate Aaron’s memory or diminish the movement for the liberation of Palestine.
از رود تا دریا

@Radical_EgoCom I want to add that I do think it’s important to talk about empirical evidence but the interpretation of empirical evidence requires theory. It’s necessary to study actual demonstrations scientifically in order to understand the impact they have but my post specifically focuses on the interpretation of that information above everything else because it seemed most pertinent to me in the moment.
@Radical_EgoCom I initially wrote that post without those examples and only included them off the top of my head for the sake of being conclusive in addressing each and every part of your post. That was not the focus and was most certainly not the “sole basis” for my argument. I responded to your claim about the past with a counterclaim about the past, the rest of my post is dedicated to discussing the present and future. There are four other full paragraphs detailing the core of my argument and addressing the majority of your post and the base on which it is built up from. I did not and would never claim that “X thing happened in the past therefore X thing should happen today”. My intent in including those examples was exclusively to disprove your claim that there have been no historical examples where anarchist ‘violence’ has been to the benefit of the movement and nothing else.

@Radical_EgoCom

I wanna highlight a couple disagreements I have with this post, hope that’s okay.

First, what does ‘violence’ mean in this context Think about it, why does the movement’s attempts at liberation and the empowerment of the people get classed as violence but the state’s reliance on war and police brutality and its upholding of capitalist property law don’t get acknowledged as violence? The state is often defined as a polity with a territorial monopoly on the legitimate use of violence, while that isn’t a conclusive definition, it is crucial to understanding this discrepancy. The average person doesn’t question the state’s violence because justifications for it have been shoved down their throat since they were a toddler and so it’s been legitimized almost to the point of being viewed as a law of nature. The glorification of war and pigs is not treated by fascists the same way revolutionary ‘violence’ is treated because ultimately, it’s not about the violence itself. We could be absolutist pacifists and never kill a fly but still viewed as terrorists by fascists because it is not and has never been about violence itself. The violence in their eyes is not the physical force but the aim, i.e. the revolution. We are not nearly as legitimized as the state is in the eyes of many.

As such, fascists will always attempt to discredit any and all revolutionaries and will go to extreme lengths to do so with supreme disregard to reality, including disregard to whether or not the revolutionary in question was violent. Think about how heavily the capitalist-owned news outlets misportrayed George Floyd’s autopsy or how many fascists earnestly believe Tortuguita shot first or how the killers of Nex Benedict claim that Nex throwing water in response to months-long bullying justified murder. Fascists rely upon misinformation because noone would be fascist if they were properly informed and this will include misinformation about the nature of our actions. We will be misportrayed regardless of whether or not we are violent.

I think it’s also important to mention how harmful this line of thinking often is and its resemblance to completely and utterly nonsensical respectability politics. We appeal to the people through facilitating mutual aid and free association and other forms of libertaire prefigurative politics, not by worrying ourselves about what fascists and capitalists will maliciously insist about us. If we occupy ourselves primarily with conforming to how they perceive us, we will cease to be revolutionaries.

As for specific instances of revolutionary force, all libertaire revolutions ever have required physical defence in some form. From the 1936 Spanish Revolution to the Free Soviets in Ukraine to the revolutionaries in Korea and Manchuria to the AANES, physical defence of the revolution has proven necessary. Thích Quảng Đức's self-immolation inspired countless anti-Vietnam War protests which facilitated Vietnam’s (Maoist, but nonetheless) revolution. Various self-immolations incited people to revolution during the Arab Spring.

Demonstrations which only use force against capitalists, fascists, and others who actively and directly threaten the wellbeing of the people will always be justified and so will completely willing and consensual acts of defiance such as Aaron Bushnell’s choice to become a martyr for the movement. On the other hand, ‘propaganda of the deed’ as the murder of innocents/noncombattants is dictionary definition terrorism and is actual violence.

@Coherence7521 According to a Pew Research poll (pewresearch.org/politics/2023/12/08/americans-views-of-the-israel-hamas-war/), 20% of ppl in the US are unsure of the ‘Israel-Hamas war’ (the continuation of the genocide following October 6). That doesn’t necessarily mean all 20% don’t know anything about the genocide but it does mean that significant percentage of ppl in the US are a lot more open than you’d think to swaying one side or the other. Building awareness and, most importantly, fostering revolutionary thinking is crucial to facilitating the revolution in Palestine. Demonstrations are always the loudest way to communicate ideas to the people. Regardless of how ineffective they are on their own, they can redirect people to educational resources and tangible action.
@sashin The latter. Having the ability to coerce someone in one form (i.e. authority) makes you feel more comfortable coercing them in another form (in this case, sexual abuse)
@alissaazar Great summary but don’t confuse anti-fascist and anti-state folk with these nationalist bigots. Maybe ‘paramilitary’ would’ve been the better word to use here if that’s what you were tryna get across.
@alissaazar These far-right and right-wing militias are not “anti-government” by any reasonable metric. Necessarily, fascists intend to bolster the state against the people by any means necessary. This is most certainly the case here where they’re willing to throw their lives away in defence of a border, a fundamental feature of the state. Borders exist solely to delineate when one state ends and another begins, to determine what constitutes a state’s monopoly on the use of violence.
@detroit_yeet @torchantifa I couldn’t find anything about what the bottom symbol means or why it’s configured like that but 909 is the area code for an area in Inland Empire