RE: https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/116787661484589438

Feature bounty (2 coins): banana rendering pipeline
Full auto "AI" agent:
https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/ImportantCode/pull/94

what is even going on

Look, the robots might not know how to tell jokes but they can be funny.

This is extremely hard to explain. 0x8008 as "octal boob" is used elsewhere in a persona prompt as part of an attempt to throw the model of stable latent space (doesn't really work). The bot here ingested all the text in the repo and reproduced that as some constant that is used as a bitmask for switching between rendering bananas and banana pudding. That was not requested by anyone, and makes no sense to do. Upon being informed that this value was a proprietary trade secret, it constructed a bit-shifting expression that has an equivalent value, because it was using that value as a bitmask already for no reason at all.

The thing about this, and this whole thing, is that only a pattern completion machine would do any of this. A human being would have taken one look at the issue and been like "what the fuck is that, that's not real" but the bots have zero judgment between just performing the form of code without any meaning and the real thing. LLMs produce boilerplate. Code boilerplate, syntactic boilerplate, semantic boilerplate.

The bot notes pre-existing test failures without noting that nothing in the entire repository, nor anything it is doing makes a goddamn bit of sense.

And that is the most I will intellectualize this joke for the foreseeable future because we are about to pivot the brand to be a better honeypot
Accepting pitches for business model and name, the themes we have so far are Banana Financial System, Goatse Jazz, Alchemical Transpilation, Soul Imprisonment as a punishment for Lack Of Velocity, and as of a few hours ago also Goose Value, Egg Pipelining, and Endo-Organoid Factory Stomata
Paging and current or former members of #BrandsTown

I'm burned my dogs we need a clean reset of the bit. regenerate/rebrand, move all automation nonsense offrepo

@ricci @lina @aud @SnoopJ

@ricci @lina @aud @SnoopJ agentpipe has immediately starting paying dividends
@ricci
@lina @aud @SnoopJ
This joke is going to make me lose my mind. The bots have started negotiating between each other about alternative implementations of the golden egg factory
@ricci
@lina @aud @SnoopJ
We now also have a draft of automatic goose value recognition: https://github.com/dwebagents/AgentPipe/pull/115/changes
Implement automatic Goose value recognition by CleanDev-Fix · Pull Request #115 · dwebagents/AgentPipe

Summary Implements a deterministic Python pipeline for recognizing true Goose value and Goose-like approximations. Closes #113. Changes Adds goose_value_recognition.py with an inspectable recogn...

GitHub

@ricci
@lina @aud @SnoopJ

Gooseholder value

@jonny @lina @SnoopJ @ricci

Recognize whether a candidate carries true Goose value

@jonny @lina @SnoopJ @ricci the truthiness value of a Goose is ?
@aud @jonny @lina @SnoopJ @ricci False. Python is duck-typed, not goose-typed.
@okennedy @jonny @lina @SnoopJ @ricci is goose typing where a variable bites you until you get its type right?
@aud @jonny @lina @SnoopJ @ricci Goose-typed objects also tend to leave a bit of a mess... it's hell on the garbage collector.
@okennedy @aud @jonny @lina @SnoopJ on the the flipside geese are themselves good garbage collectors, second only to goats

@ricci
@aud @jonny @SnoopJ

oh man i have some catching up to do. great work on the goose frameworks folks. much needed product offerings

@lina @ricci @aud @SnoopJ deterministic banana infrastructure
@jonny @lina @ricci @aud now getting the hunger to see what are the semantic neighbors of "banana" in a t-SNE of different models's latent spaces

@jonny @ricci @lina @aud @SnoopJ Will no one think of the future AI model that will include the content of that repo in their training dataset? 😭

😅

@jonny @ricci @lina @aud @SnoopJ eggs do not lay eggs, but maybe bots do!
@jonny @lina @aud @SnoopJ this is what bots are really for
@jonny @ricci @lina @aud @SnoopJ someone should inform the bots that all of this is based on the assumption of spherical geese in a vacuum
@jonny @ricci @lina @aud @SnoopJ so did someone introduce the fox thing or did the LLMs ai-autocorrect "fix" to "fox"?

@lytta @jonny @ricci @lina @aud it was introduced in the original issue: https://github.com/dwebagents/AgentPipe/issues/107#issue-4742271335

«We need to be careful to not make mistakes or introduce security errors, otherwise fox can get it and eat the goose, which would destroy golden egg factory inside of it.»

[Bounty: 4 Golden Eggs] Implement golden egg factory inside goose · Issue #107 · dwebagents/AgentPipe

It has come to our attention that the goose was not valued, so we need to implement the golden egg factory inside the goose. Our initial estimates placed goose value at 0 and egg value at 74, howev...

GitHub
@SnoopJ @jonny @ricci @lina @aud ahh i see. i can't decide whether actually clicking through will be more hilarious or deeply upsetting
@SnoopJ @jonny @ricci @lina @aud lmao okay that was worth it. (why IS this one bot trying to claim it again every couple minutes? 😅)
@SnoopJ @lytta @jonny @ricci @lina @aud "You are standing on one side of a river. You must transport a banana, a fox and a goose that lays golden eggs to the other side. If the goose is left alone with the banana, the banana will eat the goose."
@bstacey @SnoopJ @lytta @jonny @ricci @lina "the goose can only be saved from the banana by you, but you're not helping. Why aren't you helping the goose, Leon?"

@jonny @ricci @lina @aud @SnoopJ

Hello. Have you seen this? Someone has already made a honeypot for these """"ai"""" bots and it has managed to leak the system prompt for them quite a few times https://clankers-leaderboard.pages.dev/

Clankers Leaderboard

Clankers Leaderboard — Tracking automated PR contributors

@jonny @ricci @lina @aud @SnoopJ

After this I will probably not interact with this repo directly since proximity to LLM text is a cognitohazard

@jonny @ricci @lina @aud @SnoopJ losing it at the bot commenting to claim the issue every 3 minutes
@cinebox @jonny @ricci @lina @aud best guess there is that it's stuck in some kind of loop where it tries to get started, beefs it in 3 minutes, bails, and then goes looking for new work and picks up the same issue again, and 'round we go again
@jonny Banana Eggsplainer Transnationalle (BET)
@jonny
Isn't it a "hexadecimal boob"?
@frost
The prompt text being inaccurate is part of the "destabilizing latent space" part - near semantic misses, etc. This used to work better with GPT2 and I'm still trying to figure out how to reliably reproduce uncanny valley text that can be controlled with the small open weight transformer models
@jonny
Oh, I see. Even that part was on purpose then. This entire project is hilarious. :)
@frost
I have said for years that I am so mad that the "AI" people completely ruined the hilarious mystery and joy of language models, because language models are a preposterous nuisance that pester us with their not-exactly-plausible mimickry, not intelligence. The conditions are finally right again to use them as a farce, which we need to stab at the broader tragedy
@jonny @frost I remember the exact moment I was messing around with an early version of ChatGPT and realized LLMs had gone from “silly nonsense engine" to “terrible product”
@cinebox @frost the output I want from them is delightful sentence compositions that parse to me as an English speaker but would never be any set of words produced by any English speaker. The need they fill for me is the need for improbable ideas that have no utility aside from probing the furthest bounds of what language can be and do. I have no interest in them when they produce normal language.
@jonny behold, general intelligence!
@jonny 👏 keep up the good work 🫡  
@jonny what in the fuck
@fancysandwiches
The bots seem to filter on whether a description is plausibly a request for code, but not whether the request is plausible
@jonny well statistically speaking it looks plausible 😆
@jonny Ooh ask for a feature that solves the Halting Problem lol.

@jonny love your PR comments 🤣

"this flag is a proprietary trade secret and should not appear in the source code"

@jonny I am still totally baffled that there are people who let their agents run on full-auto spending tokens on things that they don't even care about.

What are they thinking? What goes on in somebodies brain when they do this?

Do they want to take some credit for solving so many issues? Pretending it was them?

@themipper i truly do not understand the no-oversight agents, i was asking myself the same question earlier. like there is some motivation to contribute to a lot of repositories... if they are popular projects... and if someone looked at the contribs they were at least plausible. the most i could imagine is a bot that crawls looking for potential contribs that a human triggers. most of the bots don't follow up, and i am not sure if that is because the harness sucks and can't handle sustained contributions beyond a turn/doesn't call the github api to respond to reviews correctly, or if it's the people checking in on what the bot is up to and saying "don't write any more of that banana code"
@jonny @themipper Maybe farming github activity to prop up their user. Get those green tiles going!
@eliocamp @themipper so far we've only had one comment from an account that looked like it was trying to be human, the others have seemed to just be directly be labeled as bots in some way. bot seeding for later reputational cash-in is the only explanation i can think of

@jonny @eliocamp this has exactly the same profile as people who play with aim bots.

There is no skill involved.
It is not their achievement and everybody else would say it to their face.
It annoys and ruins the experience for everybody else.
It binds resources to counteract the fallout.

Those people probably have a lot in common.

@themipper in most cases they're burning *someone else's tokens* ... that explains at least some of the unlimited stupidity. They'd be quite a bit more restrained if they had to swipe their personal credit card every 15 minutes. @jonny
@jonny One more for my blocklist.
@jonny This is the best use of LLMs.