That's it!
That's it!
@justincrozer Yeahh! simply anti-fascist people are meant!
@Stricki @connynasch @[email protected] @justincrozer anti-dead vision =/= anti-war vision.
At least not as long as people call it "peace" if a government slaughters its people, because there's no other nation involved.
And not as long people want to appease warmongers by demanding that the defender stops defending.
This 'pacifism' is abetment to murder.
Antifa means to stop fascists from killing.
@justincrozer Correct. The term arose in anti-fascist movements in Italy and Germany of the 1930s, as a convenient and universal shorthand for all who opposed fascism.
That said, those earliest Antifa movements were expressly Communist, and sometimes still are. But groups like Iron Front (the three arrows you may have seen) opposed ALL extremists, of all stripes, including German Antifa (Antifascistiche Aktion), a militant arm of the KPD, who were actual Stalinists.
'Antifa' is a big spectrum.
@Ilka4You oh wow. cool.
Can we use that too? Thanks a lot 😅 🖤
There is a difference here.
For ANTIFAs hate normally does not mean Concentration Camps for your enemies. 🤷
@autonomysolidarity
The word "ANTIFA" is the enemy's word. I refuse to use it. I am ANTIFASCIST.
I once heard a right-wing commentator tell his audience the word antifa meant Anti-Family.
I notice newspaper and media use the word antifa instead of antifascist.
I will NEVER use the word "antifa". I will ALWAYS force them to use the word Antifascist.
Are we really this lazy? The word is ANTIFASCIST.
@clintruin
What?
First time I hear/read s.o. stating "Antifa" as an enemy's word 😅
Maybe the word is used different, where you come from?
In Germany (and as I know also in some other European countries) "Antifa" is a self-designation. Here it has a long history:
It was used already by the "Antifaschistische Aktion" around 1930 as an abbreviation of their own name.
Latest since the 1980s "antifa" became a commom self-designation and/or part of the name of (mainly autonomous) antifascist groups.
Antifa is also a common abbreviation of the term Antifaschismus, but more it is used as term for groups or the movement.
So members of the Antifa are all antifascists, but not all antifascists are member of the Antifa 😉
So in Germany it's not at all an enemy's word (but of course right wingers are trying to defame and criminalize Antifa here, too).
@an_believable
I can't speak to German usage or German antifascists. Obviously that is an enormous topic.
I can speak to North American usage. In North America, as I've stated, the word is being used to confuse and distract. This is why I feel the word has taken on negative connotations, in English, in North America.
As stated above, if a fascist can use the word to to tell millions of Americans the word means anti-family...see what I'm saying?
@clintruin The purpose is prevent US from using it, by trying to 'brand' it in terms they get to choose. But they didn't create it, and it was originally ours, and we don't have to let them do that.
If you give in here, there's no end to it. You have to hold the line somewhere. Why not where the lie already exists? Their claims are false; we don't have to agree to them.
@Ilka4You @an_believable
So let's make it simple:
(For the English-speaking in the States and Canada)
Only use the word Antifascist. Do not use the made up word Antifa.
@clintruin No, our side really did coin it, in the 1930s. It was always exactly what it looks like -- an abbreviation of 'anti-fascist'. The advantage, besides being shorter and easier to say, is that it's the same in all Western languages, though exact pronunciation varies.
That said, I agree that it's much harder for our opponents to fight 'anti-fascists', so there's advantage in using that.
@Ulmo @autonomysolidarity you've probably haven't got the question. It is well described what fascism is. But the question is who decide who is a fascist.
In the Soviet Union, you've legally got freedom of speech (no kidding, read the constitution!!). But if you ever tried to exercise it *for real*, you was begging for criminal charges for "anti-soviet propaganda", which may have resulted in execution by shooting, long-term imprisonment or forcible treatment in a "psychiatric" (i.e. mind-killing) facility.
Somehow similarly, now we see a lot of folks who pretend to "protest" against "Israeli fascism" by killing random Jews in their cities.
@torf @autonomysolidarity How power is exercised is one thing. The ideological basis for that exercise is quite another.
The question is not who decides what fascism is, but rather what it is based on the behavior of those acts and people who follow that logic, which has been extensively studied.
In the political and social sphere, fascist thought:
- Rejects democracy, equality, and reason, replacing them with irrationalism, militarism, extreme nationalism, and the cult of violence.
- Is based on the belief in the natural inequality of human beings, the superiority of certain races or nations, and the need for internal “cleansing” and external expansion to restore national glory.
In the economic sphere:
- Rejection of free markets and efficiency-based productivity, replacing them with brute force and capitalist accumulation through exploitation and conquest.
- Resources are seized by force, not through the market, and production serves imperialist expansion, not the common good. This culminates in predatory war and genocide, as occurred under Nazism and Italian fascism and currently with the U.S. and Israel, for example.
Fascism and supremacism are twin brothers; the only difference is that in the former, the state is controlled and actions are taken in its name. In supremacism, state involvement is not necessary.