I have heard a couple stories lately about faculty trying to replace their PhD students with LLMs to do research, and I regret to inform these people:
1) you are bad people who have misunderstood the concept of graduate students entirely.
2) I guarantee you that your students have already replaced you with LLMs because they provide more effective advising.
@dan Hyperbole much?
@shriramk a bit, perhaps, but I have actually heard the profoundly bad take of "this is great, we won't need to deal with students anymore"
@dan @shriramk That's the whole thing though. I'm reading a PhD thesis (defense next week) and part of it is that I provide comments to the student and hopefully they learn something. I would not want to do that for LLM text. Basically I kind of never want to read LLM text.
@va2lam @dan Aren't you reading Dan backwards?
@shriramk @dan I can see the appeal of never having to read another PhD thesis. But educating PhD students is a key part of the job and results in more researchers in the future. I think that is consistent with Dan?

@va2lam @dan
I am 100% behind the idea that if you're a PhD advisor, or sit on a committee, you should be willing to read the dissertation yourself — or else don't serve in those roles.

They already know where to get an LLM's judgment. They asked for *yours*.

@dan Sure, yes, that is bad in some ways.
@shriramk @dan post training alignment will make sure the gradLLM still hallucinates, while the advisorLLM still digresses. Progress will be maintanined although tuition fees to cover electricty costs will eventually bankrupt the USA. again.
@shriramk @dan I was trying to summarise some stuff earlier and wound up with an 86 point list of reasons why I will not use "AI": https://people.freebsd.org/~bms/no-thankyou-genai.txt
@dan The great irony is those who are the most excited about replacing other humans with software are themselves the most actually replaceable by software.