I’m deeply uncomfortable with Microsoft attempting to weaponise their extensive law enforcement contacts to arrest people who post zero days in the products.

It comes after the researcher was kicked off GitHub (owned by Microsoft), Gitlab (a Microsoft partner), after they were doxxed on Twitter and had their MSRC - Microsoft vulnerability reporting portal - account disabled.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/msrc/blog/2026/05/a-shared-responsibility-protecting-customers-through-coordinated-vulnerability-disclosure

Do I think the finder was acting rationally? No. Do I think Microsoft gets to decide what is criminal activity around proof of concept exploits? No.

GitHub has long been a source for zero days exploits in competitor products - it still is. While I worked there GitHub had a policy saying they wouldn’t remove them.

By continually removing just exploits for their own products from Github and declaring “criminal activity”, it’s a rubicon.

@GossiTheDog

I wonder if anyone in CELA signed off on simultaneously doing a thing and publicly declaring that doing that thing is criminal behaviour.

@GossiTheDog
So that's why linux is getting the press about zero days when windows is still the most rickty shit you ever saw
@GossiTheDog Shit, Microsoft was basically *built* on the other side of the Rubicon, to torture the analogy. Never have they ever been accused of being ethical.
@lykso @GossiTheDog
Microsoft attained market dominance in the eighties by scaring people with fake error messages, so yeah. People should remember better
@GossiTheDog I was actually surprised that the repos weren’t taken down sooner given Microsoft’s track record with similar cases affecting their products.
@GossiTheDog To add, according to Low Level's video on the subject, Microsoft marked previous zero days the person reported as ineligible for its bug bounty program (saying administrator to kernel/system access is not a security boundary).
@GossiTheDog that sounds like it should be illegal somehow, wow