There’s functionally no engineering reason to put a robot on two legs. Every other form factor is cheaper, more stable, more efficient, and easier to maintain.

There is, however, a very good marketing reason: everyone’s watched Terminator, fear goes viral, and anxiety drives attention.

A warehouse robot is infrastructure.

A humanoid robot is an engagement strategy…

@Daojoan

Aaakshully

Two legs makes sense.

1. Minimum suspension mats (vs tripod or quad+)

2. Nature doesn't do wheels.

3. There are other ground propulsion methods (wigglies etc) but not fast.

4. Once you got the balance software going, legs are super fast.

5. You could have alternatives, but they are medium specific (arboreal, hydrous), legs are universal.

6. Flight has specific downsides mass/energy also medium specific

Just about the only half decent alternative is snake.
But legs > snake

@n_dimension @Daojoan I'd say crabs instead of snakes. The crabbification must have some good reasons.
Everything is Crab: The Animal Evolution Roguelite on Steam

The Animal Evolution Roguelite. Hunt, Flee, Scavenge and Thrive in a living ecosystem. Choose from 125+ Evolutions and Specialisations for unique creature combinations in every run. Adapt to survive the natural curve in order to beat carcinisation... or get Darwin'd trying!

@n_dimension @Daojoan there must be a good reason for most mammals to be four legged

@ehproque @Daojoan

Good point!

In my most authoritative , though uninformed voice I will assert that's because;

a) Balance software not so good
b) Faster
c) Claws/Hooves can attack while relatively stable.

Human "forelimbs" evolved for grasping.

@ehproque @[email protected] @Daojoan It's because the particular fish that crawled up the beach 390 million years ago and was the ancestor of all terrestrial vertebrates had four load bearing fins.
We are tetrapods, and so are all mammals, birds and lizards (including snakes!).