Soatok DreamseekerSo if I understand correctly:
The IETF TLS-WG and Last-Call mailing lists be like:
- Concern-trolling over vague process stuff in order to drag an informational, recommended=N RFC draft into a quagmire to prevent an RFC number from being allocated? OK.
- Citing a celebrated rapist as a supporter of your objection? OK.
- Being said rapist and participating in the mailing list to the detriment to anyone that might feel unsafe by your presence? OK.
Me pointing out that Jacob Appelbaum is a rapist? Whoa now, that's a bridge too far. Gotta censor that!
Me replying to one of the moderators who objected to my initial reply with my "Hug?" sticker: "The worst in people".
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ApZbYc1ZFRWqWQ4MFM2ATCKvOqc/
Or at least, Bron Gondwana, CEO of Fastmail, seems to think so.
(The other IETF moderators weren't jerks about it, but Bron was.)
(EDIT: DJB was briefly moderated, but IESG overturned it.)
Jacob Appelbaum rape report
In May 2016, the Tor project blog announced that Jacob Appelbaum was stepping down from the project. Appelbaum, who often uses the handle "ioerror", is a longtime member of the information security community and supporter of Julian Assange. Shortly afterward, multiple Tor developers publicly accused Appelbaum of rape. On May 24, @puellavulnerata tweeted "A precommitment:", followed by a hexadecimal string. [1] On June 2, @puellavulnerata revealed that the previously-tweeted string was the...
nLupo 
Stefen Auris 🖖​
Tael 🔜 AC26
Luna Lactea
MrGrumpyMonkey
Greg Bell
punIssuer