๐ฟ๐’ถ๐“ƒ๐’ถ "not yet begun to fight"
I'm going to say this in the most diplomatic possible way that doesn't actively hide the truth. We are being ruled by the dumbest fucking inbred morons who ever ate a raccoon penis.
Apr 23 at 4:26pmWeb
Show threadMatt HallApr 23

@Lana

๐Ÿ‘€

JFC.

The man was wrong. The man is wrong. It's not hard. We can all fucking say it. We can all fucking _see_ it.

Trump can't do basic math. He's what the lay-folk refer to as a fucking idiot. Smooth brain mother fuckers. GAAAAH.

I'm surprised that RFK Jr, a well know rat, hasn't yet jumped ship.

Show thread๐ฟ๐’ถ๐“ƒ๐’ถ "not yet begun to fight"Apr 23
@401matthall brainworms. They all have brainworms.
Show threadMatt HallApr 23

@Lana

Starving... Dead... Empty-tummied... Brainworms.

Show threadMatt HallApr 23

@Lana

You can shake their heads and hear what sounds like dozens of meal-worms clicking around in there.

...

I gotta a lot hate over here. ๐Ÿ‘€

Show thread๐ฟ๐’ถ๐“ƒ๐’ถ "not yet begun to fight"Apr 23
@401matthall at this point I feel like that's the level of hate that's actually justified.
Show threadMatt HallApr 23

@Lana

Heard.

Show threadXenofact (he/him)Apr 23
@Lana it's a weird feeling to think "we may beat fascism because the fascists are stupid dumbfucks" but I'll take it.
Show threadanubis2814Apr 23
@RevXenoFact @Lana I mean its how we beat Hitler, fired all the competent people and replaced them with loyal yes morons
Show threadSablebadgerApr 23

@Lana alternative math to go with alternative facts.

These people are beyond broken.

Show threadsaxnot โžก๏ธ GPN, RockHarzApr 23
@Sablebadger @Lana don't interrupt an enemy while they make a mistake
Show threadRob van Kan๐Ÿ”ปApr 23
@Lana Never underestimate the enemy, ever.
Show threadRev. Dr. MazigaziApr 23
@Lana wait, so there are smarter eaters of raccoon penii?
Show threadEric SchutteApr 23
@Lana
#RemoveTrumpAdministration #JudgementDayWillCome
Show threadStephen CollinsApr 23
@Lana @stufromoz what is math?
Show threadKanaMaunaApr 23

@Lana

I wonder how many tariff lawyers just sprang into action.

Show threadsaxnot โžก๏ธ GPN, RockHarzApr 23

@Lana "alternative facts" and "different percentages" are so funny to me.

Yeah It's easy to believe that DJT believes that.
doesn't make it any less wrong

Show threadM SchommerApr 24
@saxnot @Lana
No, Ms <enter teacher's name>, my answer isn't wrong. I'm having a different math!
Show threadsaxnot โžก๏ธ GPN, RockHarzMay 1

@musevg @Lana yeah they have a different math

a math which is wrong

Show threadSimonApr 23
@Lana shouldn't it be a 590 % reduction in their โ€œlogicโ€?
Show threadjon rApr 23
@Lana
Hard to disagree.
Show threadLisaHApr 23
@Lana who ever scraped off the pavement and ate a rotting roadkill raccoon penis ๐Ÿคฎ
Show threadBurr DemingApr 23
@Lana
well...
...okay, so there is that...
Show threadSome GuyApr 24

@Lana I can state quite confidently:

We are turbofucked.

Show threadWesDymApr 24
@Lana Yeah, different and WRONG, shithead.
Show threadRevK Apr 24

@Lana I simply cannot make sense of that at all. I mean we know it is wrong, but at first I thought he was considering percentage of the reduced amount, i.e. he sees increasing something 600% and then decreasing it 600% gets the same number, but that does not even make sense...

$10 increase to $600 is increase by 5900% or increase to 6000% of original.

$600 to $10 is decrease by 98โ…“%

600% does not come in to it!

Show threadpoleguy looking for lost toolsApr 24

@revk @Lana https://deadsimpletech.com/blog/why-redacted-wins

It makes sense with a Bayesian interpretation.

Thanks to
@iris_meredith
my eyes are open.

Why wank wins | deadSimpleTech

My 2025 article An essay on wank proved to be startlingly widely read. It made its way around a large part of the internet, sparked quite a lot of discussion and still garners quite a few readers, even now. It was, to my mind, not too bad an article, but as is quite often the case with the first inceptions of an idea, a bit scattershot and often not very tight argumentatively. What this is to say is that there are a bunch of gaps in the article which, as of April 2026, are kind of annoying me. There is also considerable demand for more analysis on wank theory, and as the quantity of wank that we deal with has only increased since I wrote the last article, extending the argument and making it more rigorous seems like it might be a good idea.

deadSimpleTech
Show threadpoleguy looking for lost toolsApr 24
@revk @Lana @iris_meredith although this particular line is simple BS. But he just won the large portion of his base who hated math in school.
Show threadSzymon Sokรณล‚ ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆApr 24
@revk @Lana Well, I think he enhanced a logic error ("60*price" is 6000% more expensive, so "price/60" is %6000 cheaper) with a typing error (one zero lost).
Show threadRevK Apr 24
@blotosmetek @Lana well possibly, though 60*price is 5900% more expensive but he has no clue either way.
Show threadKoboldApr 24
@Lana Wait, you mean this is not a meme or satire???
Show threadRupert ReynoldsApr 24

@Lana I know a genuine dribbling moron, complete with IQ ~70, who probably wouldn't get the figures that wrong. He's also great fun, warm-hearted, and quick to help other people.

Unlike these diseases...

Show threadRupert ReynoldsApr 24
@Lana For the avoidance of doubt, my friend sometimes describes himself in those terms, which is unfortunate because he is what we used to call "a diamond geezer" and an inspiration, and in truth the world needs more like him.
Show threadRupert ReynoldsApr 24

@Lana JOOI has anyone worked out a way in which those figures might almost-nearly make sense?

I feel for all the good people in USA who do not deserve the ridicule and scorn the world now pours on the whole of the USA, out of habit :-(

Show threadThat Dud BlokeApr 24
@Lana How come THIS Kennedy hasn't been shot??