If it’s funded with public money, it should be public code.

That means guaranteeing the 4 freedoms:
πŸ”“ Use the code
πŸ” Study how it works
✏️ Modify it
πŸ” Share it

Do you agree?
✍️ Sign the open letter
πŸ“’ Share it with your network
πŸ›οΈ Call on decision-makers to invest in public code

πŸ’» https://publiccode.eu

#PublicCode #DigitalSovereignty #FreeSoftware

https://publiccode.eu/en/

@fsfe This should be so uncontroversial, yet the system is so broken.
In our own experience as a for profit organisation willing to release as free and open source the results of (partially) public funded projects we are held back mainly by public research institutions.
@beps @fsfe Thank you for sharing this frustration! Can you elaborate on the details of your experience? Which for profit organisation, and what was it about public research institutions that prevented you from releasing your thing under an open source license? I'd love to have something to point to when I tell others about this story!
@nacly @fsfe We work in the field of air quality numerical modelling and we experienced just that: public research organisations not willing to release numerical models as open and free. Models developed in the academic environment and (partially) funded by public grants.
This is to get an hypothetical advantage in producing new publications, getting additional funding in forthcoming public grants and even doing paid consulting (masked as academic research).
@beps @fsfe Ah, I see. Thank you for explaining! As someone who has done academic research, I've seen this quite often. It's really frustrating......😩