@GrapheneOS It's great you're taking time to clear up factually incorrect claims, whether they're made out of maliciousness or naivety. Constructive community engagement is great!
But please, for the love of god, this information only belongs A) in the threads where factually incorrect claims are being made and B) on your website in the FAQ section.
I know it's not intuitive, but pushing conflict into everyone's face again and again makes your project seem *less* trustworthy, not more.
@me @tastyraspberry @GrapheneOS
What a horribly apathetic thing to say. They wouldnt respond to abuse if they werent being abused.
@HybridStaticAnimate @me @tastyraspberry @GrapheneOS
The same here, I only scroll my home feed till the first of 30 posts clarifying again that eOS is bad. This should be considered spam. I don’t even know what is GOS referencing at this point. Is it new eOS attack every time? Is their CEO constantly posting shit about GOS?
@richlv @me @dwaem @tastyraspberry @GrapheneOS
GOS regularly posts evidence with their claims.
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116388159407099477
Heres more info.
/e/ and Murena have been been promoting their products by misleading people about GrapheneOS for years. This has turned into an all out war on GrapheneOS by their company and supporters. We began regularly debunking their inaccurate claims and they try to frame it as aggression.