Europe, the AI Continent.

One year ago, we launched the AI Continent Action Plan. Since then, we have made huge strides:

✅ 19 AI factories are now live across EU countries.
✅ We established the AI Skills Academy to train experts.
✅ The AI Omnibus is cutting costs for business.
✅ We have earmarked €1 billion to support AI adoption in industry.

We are building a secure and innovative AI future for Europe.

Here's how 👉 https://link.europa.eu/nj3VH9

@EUCommission no one wants this stuff
@peachymist @EUCommission i'm an EU citizen and i object to all this very heavily

@lumi @peachymist @EUCommission i let my EU citizenship expire

unity is cool and all. but why have a union of capitalists

Hi @peachymist! Artificial intelligence already plays a crucial role in our daily lives, and as AI develops, it holds even greater potential to improve the lives of EU citizens: enhancing disease prevention, reducing traffic fatalities, anticipating cyber threats, and much more. That's why we are proposing rules and actions for AI, enabling us to harness its full potential and maximise its benefits.
@EUCommission @peachymist https://arxiv.org/html/2604.04721v1 You are permanently destroying your civilization.
AI Assistance Reduces Persistence and Hurts Independent Performance

@EUCommission @peachymist you are conflating “AI” and machine learning. please do not equate LLM chatbots to geniune applications of machine learning

@EUCommission
Maybe you got @peachymist wrong:

No 👏 one 👏 wants 👏 this 👏 stuff 👏.

You're welcome.
/cc @aral

@EUCommission if you think genAI is impressive, your brain doesn't work. The only rule worth implementing is a total ban.
@EUCommission @peachymist I'd like Europe to be the AI-free continent.
@Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist much as I don’t want AI in everything- that ship has sailed. Given the problem at the heart of the EU is translation - having “boxed” llms that only work on a specific corpus of work and can translate is something that could be useful. The open web scraping nonsense can get in the sea.

@dianshuo @Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist

Products can fail and disappear from the marketplace.

Here's an entire museum dedicated to the history of commercial failures.

https://museumoffailure.com/

Museum of Failure

Museum of Failure
@Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist I think it’s important to differentiate between Generative AI (ChatGPT et all) and machine learning (ML) AI. ML can help automate and optimise loads of tasks across industries, and Europe should be on the edge of this instead of eating whatever the US spits out.

It makes sense to invest, and it makes sense to explore.

@kevin @Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist

Fully agree, there is a (big) difference between the two.

As an example, ML is extremely useful and good at translation languages — and that’s already since well before the chatbots started. Also a lot of other breakthroughs in science are done or improved with ML, and not GenAI, like protein folding.

While ML can be considered as a part of AI, it should be clearly separated from the LLMs which are, simply put, just random word combiners.

@kevin @Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist you are too hopeful, all the investments mentioned in the OP link are for GenAI. That AI skills academy? Aims for GenAI degrees, those investments? GenAI https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/genai4eu
The action plan? AI Factories for genAI https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/114523
GenAI4EU: Funding opportunities to boost Generative AI “made in Europe”

The European Commission has launched a first wave of EU funding opportunities to integrate generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Europe’s strategic sectors, and keep their competitive edge.

Shaping Europe’s digital future
@Gargron
to late people are using it they are already addicted
@EUCommission @peachymist

@Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist

+1 if AI is basically a synonym for LLMs.

If it’s about finally taking data quality serious, thinking hard about our underlying algorithmic problems and then applying heuristical methods, then yes please let’s do that and support institutions in this journey.

@Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist I understand the sentiment, but it’s militarily and economically untenable. Europe’s militaries would fall behind. Most economic sectors, where not already a victim of Baumol’s cost disease, would become victims of Baumol’s cost disease. The genie is out of the bottle, and to put it back in would require unanimous participation, including bad actors.
@Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist for real, Europe don’t be stupid like us here in the USA destroying our communities for data centers and driving power rates and consumption into the stratosphere for LLMs and generative AI.

@Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist I’m afraid I can’t agree with you here. Europe is not a separate planet, isolated from the rest of the world. If we, as Europe, do not adopt and develop the most advanced solutions, we will simply lose our competitiveness - both in terms of products and the workforce.

We can already see this very clearly in the automotive industry. If we turn away from innovation, Europe risks falling into a deep economic crisis instead of strengthening its position.

@mczachurski @EUCommission @peachymist AI 1) deskills workers 2) makes access to information and knowledge harder 3) concentrates wealth within big tech. Europe would be MORE competetive without AI.
@Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist AI will undoubtedly change how we build software. In some ways it will help, in others it will harm. But this has already begun and cannot be stopped. Europe cannot simply opt out, or companies will move to Asia or the US, leaving us with rising unemployment. We must build something better: ethical, competitive AI. Europe has the talent and resources to do it. 😉
@mczachurski @EUCommission @peachymist You are not listening to what I am saying.
@Gargron @mczachurski @EUCommission @peachymist to further the discussion, please provide some clarity as to what AI is, or at least the definition by which you abide. Then, please elaborate on your points that Al 1) deskills workers 2) makes access to information and knowledqe harder 3) concentrates wealth within big tech. Such that any country would be MORE competetive without Al.

@Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist 1) Work will shift: less manual coding, more reviewing, directing, and managing AI agents. 2) AI adds tools; it does not remove search engines or other ways of accessing knowledge. 3) Wealth is concentrated for now, but that is temporary - smaller local models are already emerging, even on phones.

You cannot be more competitive if you refuse to offer the services the market demands.

@mczachurski @Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist Absolutely and utterly disagree with point (1). That is entirely a choice, not a given, and plenty of people are chosing well to continue writing code (for a variety of crucial reasons).

As for (3), local models do *not* solve many of the ethical problems with how these models are built, trained, and propagated.

I really respect the work you've done in the fedi space. But we are clearly not in alignment on this topic.

@jaredwhite @Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist On point (1), in large companies this will not really be a choice. That is where most people earn their living. Those who do not adapt will lose opportunities, and their market value will decline.

On point (3), it is entirely possible to build models using only sources whose authors have given consent: documented, ethical, and open source. And once such models no longer belong to large corporations, those corporations will lose their dominance.

@jaredwhite @Gargron @EUCommission @peachymist We cannot talk about an AI-free continent and do nothing. That would be like calling for a continent free of machines during the industrial revolution.

Europe must engage and do this properly. The issue is not resources, but vision. I can imagine an euAI@Home project, like SETI@home, where a distributed network (open sourced) helps build transparent (open) models whose data and design we fully understand.

Perhaps I am being too optimistic. 😉

@EUCommission
As usual, the fact that it destroys more than the slop-output is worth is completely ignored!
@peachymist
@EUCommission @peachymist
It only improves the live of scammers, con men and people spreading misinformation. And yes, by that i mean the users and the ai-companys.
@EUCommission @peachymist the things you are describing are useful. But GenAI like ChatGPT and Claude and Copilot being pressure-pushed into everyone's throats by evil and soulless corporations like Meta, Anthropic and OpenAI is something very different and you MUST communicate that distinction. There are differences between the GenAI apps that dumb everyone down, destroy knowledge, spread misinformation and do nothing but enrich the rich and those used in science. When you communicate about AI we need to know which one you mean.

@EUCommission we don't want, we want choice, we want personal data protected from being used for IA training, we want choice about interaction with AI for services, or interaction with humans, and we want to be informed ahead of time if any of our data is going to be processed by AI and mandatory easy access to recourse to humans whenever AI processes data, specially in public services.

We want that all models be Open Source AI, and all data sets to be made fully accessibly by all

@peachymist

@EUCommission @peachymist you have no idea what a neural net and learning in that context means. Which is used in llm, the thing currently stamped as AI. While this term is a moniker term for all tech that fools users into believing it is intelligent while it is not (hence the artificial in the name)

@EUCommission it olds greatest potential to ruin our lives, and not only you deciced to not protect us enough from being under surveilance with it, you're also proposing to weaken our personal data protections from it.

@peachymist

@EUCommission @peachymist I am a Software Developer. AI plays almost no role in my life. There are a few areas where algorithms are not the tool of choice and AI might be a solution (protein folding, translations).

Here is a list that has effects - that’s like potential but even cooler:

Desease Prevention: Tax Sugar, Ban alcohol ads

Reduce traffic fatalities: force speed limits (yeah especially for Germany where I’m from) 120-100 on highway, 30 in cities and towns

There is nothing to “harness”. This is not about “benefits”. Otherwise you wouldn’t repeat TechBros slang and DO something instead of throwing money at dubious and uncertain business models which rob tax money that could have made life’s better.

@EUCommission @peachymist there is a difference between generative models, like chatgpt and stable diffusion, and more general machine learning. lumping them both into "ai" does us all a disservice

the former are a parasitic cancer that's spreading from silicon valley, the latter can be useful. but the latter does not need huge datacenters and does not need to regurgitate the whole creative output of humanity

the former is offensive and should be illegal, not promoted. the reason that it got so prominent is the tech industry pushing it and spreading fomo. it's abusive and offensive technology and it has no place in a human society

@EUCommission @peachymist the Commission’s first post uses “AI” to describe generative AI infrastructure. Its reply contains use cases where *non-LLM* AI is doing great things. I don’t think LLMs are helping with disease prevention or traffic fatalities. They’re helping write memos.

If the European Commission doesn’t understand the difference between machine learning algorithms and large language models, it shouldn’t make pronouncements about the utility of “AI”.

@EUCommission @peachymist quid de la consommation monstrueuse en eau, électricité, et matériel électronique des centres de données ?
On parle d'un désastre écologique réel face à des bénéfices "potentiels" qui ne se concrétisent pas.
@EUCommission @peachymist à titre personnel je n'utilise pas les LLM/modèles de génération d'image mais ils affectent ma vie quotidienne négativement en polluant le web de contenu faux ou inintéressant.
@EUCommission LLMs, which you are branding as "AI," cannot do any of those things, let alone as well as a human could. What they can do is enrich shareholders.
@EUCommission @peachymist The only thing that prevents traffic fatalities is eliminating traffic. And you’re doing a terrible work at that. In the last decades the total length of train tracks in Europe decreased. I can’t take a train from Lisbon to Madrid that doesn’t take 4x as long as driving. We keep protecting our corrupt auto industry instead of investing tens of billions of euros per year in transit. No AI needed, just fast, reliable trains, local and cross border. Look at China and japan

@EUCommission @peachymist

It also holds the potential to relegate huge sectors of the population unemployed, and to replace our thinking processes with mindless deferral. Not to mention how it is burning down the planet and sucking up limited water resources so that it can be wrong most of the time about most things. And devastating the income and credibility of artists and writers, musicians and creators of film, stealing from them and giving no credit. It is a blight, and it needs to be HEAVILY regulated, and completely shunned in most industries.

@EUCommission @peachymist that's not AI, that's statistics and machine learning, and the work of thousands of researchers whose jobs are being menaced by this reckless run towards "AI"-fication of society
@EUCommission @peachymist beyond the hype, it’s often wrong, self-referential, and encroaching on other spaces: do a Bing search for “image description” and the summary box suggests using ai tools, which are not only laughably wrong but cannot know the context and relevant details to include.
#slopaganda