this is very fucking dumb, "who is satoshi?" is such a 2014 question, and this article is a nothingburger
at least they're not still harassing Dorian Nakamoto
this is very fucking dumb, "who is satoshi?" is such a 2014 question, and this article is a nothingburger
at least they're not still harassing Dorian Nakamoto
@hellbeast @davidgerard Based on the Australian Tax Office absolutely wetting its pants with glee at the thought of raking in billions in capital gains tax at the mere sniff of Craig Wright being Satoshi, the Real Satoshi should keep a very low profile.
(For the record, not Satoshi)
(For the record, not Satoshi)
That sounds suspiciously like something an Australian Satoshi worried about taxes would say!
@davidgerard his evidence is hilarious. “He used C++ and was interested in distributed systems and PGP!”
Duh I could be Satoshi
@sfoskett yeah lots of filler that makes one doubt the author is familiar with what he's covering. Like bringing up libertarian beliefs, political activity, open source, comments about centralized architectures are all par for the course for anyone in the cypherpunk context. And crypto T-shirts are not some original idea like he presents it since tons of people were doing those back then...
Would be more interesting to see if Satoshi's original code has any resemblance to Back's.
@davidgerard on one hand, I hate those "unmask someone who wants to remain masked" things.
On the other, there are valid questions about some engineering decisions related to Bitcoin, there are anomalies in the early mined bitcoins[1], and Satoshi Nakamoto presumably still holds a lot of BTC, enough to make serious movements in the market.
So there is a "with great power there should be some transparency I guess" kind of thing here.
[1] https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0258001&type=printable
@davidgerard oh no doubt, 💯 right.
I was talking in general terms.