The Document Foundation expelled 30+ LibreOffice developers, many from Collabora Productivity, citing unclear legal conflicts despite major code contributions. ⚖️
Collabora plans a fork, raising risks to stability and governance transparency, as FOSS sustainability and user control depend on open stewardship. 🔐

🔗 https://byteiota.com/libreoffice-ejects-30-core-developers-fork-imminent/

#TechNews #LibreOffice #Office #OpenSource #FOSS #Collabora #Linux #Governance #Transparency #Privacy #Security #Software #Freedom #Developers #Tech #Europe #EU

LibreOffice Ejects 30+ Core Developers: Fork Imminent

byteiota

@knoppix95

sounds ominous

any theories as to what's happening inside TDF?

@knoppix95 What a shame. Just a free software is gaining momentum.

@knoppix95

Erst das Fiasko mit OnlyOffice bezüglich der EuroOffice-Pläne und jetzt das, nachdem sich mehrere öffentliche Institutionen zu FOSS bekannt haben.

Sie spielen Microsoft direkt in die Hände und werden dafür sorgen, dass MS Office für weitere 50 Jahre fest verankert bleibt.

Man sollte schleunigst Schadensbegrenzung betreiben, bevor die Sache außer Kontrolle gerät.

#EuroOffice #OnlyOffice #Nextcloud #LibreOffice #FOSS

@libreoffice
@nextcloud

Let's put an end to the speculation - TDF Community Blog

Ideally, we would have preferred to avoid this post. However, the articles and comments published in response to Collabora’s and Michael Meeks’ biased posts compel us to provide this background information on the events that led to the current situation. Unfortunately, we have to start from the very beginning, but we’ll try to keep it brief. The launch of the LibreOffice project and The Document Foundation was handled with great enthusiasm by the founding group. They were driven by a noble goal, but also by a bit of healthy recklessness. After all, it was impossible to imagine what would happen after September 28, 2010, the date of the announcement. At the time, nobody could imagine that the companies that had supported OpenOffice.org until then would create a project to kill LibreOffice. Also, if the project were to be successful, it would require resources greater than those available, and above all, a deep management experience. Fortunately, the project grew quite rapidly. However, the founders’ different backgrounds and opinions were at the same time the reason for some bold decisions – many of which right – as well as a few mistakes, which are the root cause of some of the current

TDF Community Blog
Our sense of meritocracy - TDF Community Blog

Meritocracy is one of the founding principles of the free and open-source software movement. It is also one of the most controversial terms, and the gap between the different meanings people attribute to it is, in some projects, a source of real and damaging conflict. Let us analyse the meaning of the word, because its potential ambiguity can significantly influence the debate and the various viewpoints. The theory of legitimacy based on the commit graph One version of meritocracy argues that governance authority should follow contribution, and that contribution is best measured through code. According to this view, the people who have contributed most to the code have the right to decide the project’s future, because they know the source code and have a personal stake in the most literal sense of the term. This is not an unreasonable position for a project in its early stages. Although it is also necessary to consider infrastructure, raise funds, and manage relations with the media and institutions, when the main challenge is technical in nature, when the community is small, and when the stakes are low, it makes sense that those doing most of the work should also make most of the

TDF Community Blog