GrapheneOSThis is an extreme misrepresentation of both what Gaël Duval said in this interview and our response to it. What he clearly said is that /e/ and Murena aren't providing security hardening which he claims is only useful for pedophiles, criminals and spies. Gaël Duval has repeatedly said this in his posts including ones where he directly says GrapheneOS is only useful for pedophiles, criminals and spies. We can show archives of numerous posts with him saying exactly that.
We shared a video of Gaël Duval once again making these claims because that's harder to dismiss than his written posts across platforms. He has made the same claims in both French and English. Multiple /e/ supporters participating in ongoing attacks on GrapheneOS with inaccurate claims have tried to dismiss this based on him not explicitly mentioning GrapheneOS in the video and by spinning what he said. That's fine, we can make another thread with a collection of his posts saying this elsewhere.
Duval has a history of claiming serious privacy and security protections only help pedophiles, criminals and spies. He has explicitly smeared GrapheneOS this way repeatedly, but also attacks privacy projects in general as he did there.
/e/ and Murena products have poor privacy and atrocious security. Here's information on that with links to coverage by third party experts:
We can make an expanded article with more info and more links to 3rd party experts included too.
2nd recent example of Duval portraying serious privacy/security protections as being for pedophiles:
https://www.clubic.com/actualite-604786-murena-e-os-interview.html
Translation:
> But above all, we must not confuse the issue: /e/OS allows its users to avoid the massive collection of personal data that takes place on smartphones currently on the market—it is not designed to help child sex offenders evade the law. In other words: /e/OS is not a system designed for enhanced security that would be useful only to specific individuals.
"On arrive à un point de bascule violent" : le fondateur de /e/OS alerte sur la souveraineté - Interview
Gaël Duval a cofondé Mandrake Linux en 1998. Près de trente ans plus tard, le fondateur de Murena et de /e/OS n'a pas changé de combat, mais le monde, lui, commence à rattraper ses convictions.
Duval makes many false claims about /e/ in this article.
He repeats his extraordinarily false claim that they ship the latest security patches each month across devices which they don't do on a single device let alone all of them. Shipping backports of AOSP patches is not providing all the security patches.
He once again misleads people about their speech-to-text service sending user data to OpenAI. Running it through their own servers first is not anonymizing it.
https://community.e.foundation/t/voice-to-text-feature-using-open-ai/70509
Voice to Text feature using Open AI
Thank you a lot for your positive and supporting comments about our new /e/OS Voice-to-text! Regarding its implementation in /e/OS, I’d like to explain a few things to explain why we have chosen an OpenAI STT API to implement it and how it’s going to evolve in the future: What we have learned from our experimentations with STT models that run locally on the smartphone for speech recognition: they work quite poorly, they make a lot of mistakes in voice recognition they are not able to mix la...
He downplays the large number of default enabled Google services added by /e/ with extensive privileged access. Contrary to his claims, it does use Google Play binaries both in apps using it and ones downloaded by microG which they enabled by default.
Murena previously claimed server side encryption was good enough for their audience and comparable to actual end-to-end encryption. They ended up leaking highly sensitive user data across accounts for their services:
https://community.e.foundation/t/e-foundation-ecloud-security-notice-june-15-2022/42420
E Foundation/ecloud Security Notice June 15, 2022
We have confirmed, based on a recent investigation, that limited user data was leaked on Sunday, May 29th 2022 impacting 26 of our cloud users. During an unexpected state of our services due to a service migration, we encountered some authentication conflicts. During this time window, these conflicts led to some users connecting to our services (379 users in total) to being wrongly authenticated and potentially seeing some other users’ files belonging to 26 impacted users, restricted to files t...
glimbusGlorbo@GrapheneOS Hello! With all due respect, I only followed this account because I was under the impression I would primarily receive gOS news and updates. As of late this conversation has dominated my feed. I encourage you to continue to do what you think is best with this account. Where should I go to just receive news on gOS updates in a more concise way? Thank you!
Vovan@glimbusGlorbo @GrapheneOS I use their atom feed for GrapheneOS changelog
Johannes Leutenegger 🤔@glimbusGlorbo Get used to the drama, I am personally torn, if I like it or not. @GrapheneOS
@glimbusGlorbo These are GrapheneOS news and updates. Our project and team are being attacked in France and elsewhere in an attempt to marginalize the project by portraying it as being for criminals. It's being done directly by French national law enforcement smearing the GrapheneOS project and there's a government-funded company in France directly participating in it. It's important for people to know what is happening in order for the protect to be protected from these attacks on us.
Claude ChampagneBon, et si on parlait de façon plus positive de GrapheneOS maintenant?
Wolfgang@GrapheneOS I would love to see these archives, especially instances where he says that GrapheneOS is for criminals and pedophiles
@notthebee They've repeatedly posted the claim in written form and it's clearly what was being said in the video despite your attempt and spinning it. We're currently gathering up cases of their attacks on GrapheneOS including where they've misrepresented what it provides, claimed it isn't usable or compatible and presented it as only useful in extreme circumstances. In multiple cases, they're claimed it's primarily useful to criminals as Duval did in that video for all hardening in general.
🌱🏴🅰️🏳️⚧️🐧🔧📎 Ambiyelp@GrapheneOS I would switch to grapheneOS if I could use it on fairphone because I believe in an absolute right to privacy its not just for abusers. I'm not going to get a phone other than the fairphone because it's more important to me that there is no slavery and conflict minerals used in the phone and the modularity is a nice plus too. So unless grapheneOS supports a phone that has these features I can't ethically justify buying a phone without them just to use it.
#GrapheneOS #Android #Fairphone #ConflictMinerals #ModernSlavery
@ambiguous_yelp Fairphones don't come close to meeting our security requirements and we'll never work with a company partnered with Murena. You don't need to give any money or support to /e/ and Murena in order to use a Fairphone. You use LineageOS which is more private and secure than /e/.
Fairphone's claims about updates, long term support, privacy and security aren't accurate. It's possible their Chinese ODM has awful working conditions. They mostly use regular components regardless.
Olivenolje@GrapheneOS in a fairy world in which Fairphone met your hardware and software requirements, would you consider working with them?
Daniël@ambiguous_yelp @GrapheneOS maybe buying a second-hand Pixel is an option? Re-using a phone is a great way of reducing the impact of phone production.
Fairphone is bad when it comes to security. It doesn't have a secure element like the Titan M2 in the Pixel (only TrustZone) and their kernels, firmware blobs etc. are way outdated. Even on the FP6 they are still shipping firmware blobs from June last year, even though Qualcomm does monthly security bulletins.
@ambiguous_yelp @GrapheneOS For comparison, Apple added a secure element to iPhones in the 5s in 2013 (!). Google added the first Titan M secure element to the Pixel 3 in 2018: https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/devices/pixel/titan-m-makes-pixel-3-our-most-secure-phone-yet/
Fairphone, Volla, etc. are waaay behind when it comes to device security and I would never recommend these devices to anyone.
(You cannot have privacy without security.)
nebucatnetzer@danieldk @ambiguous_yelp @GrapheneOS It is bad choises all around.
Using a second hand phone reduces the climate impact a bit but you're increasing the value of the device which is from an U.S. company. Especially one that has currently increasingly stupid ideas how Android should evolve.
In the end everybody has to pick their poison.
Using a second hand phone reduces the climate impact a bit but you're increasing the value of the device which is from an U.S. company. Especially one that has currently increasingly stupid ideas how Android should evolve.
In the end everybody has to pick their poison.
@nebucatnetzer @ambiguous_yelp @GrapheneOS That is very much a secondary effect though. By buying a new Fairphone you are directly financing a Chinese ODM (T2Mobile) that develops the hardware and software, with proprietary Chinese TCL blobs.
And for the large price you get a phone with an SoC, cameras, and speakers of a 200-300 Euro phone.
Most of the extra cost does not go to wages, the extra wage cost is ~$1.90 according to their own marketing materials
@nebucatnetzer @ambiguous_yelp @GrapheneOS Conflict-free minerals are a good point, but you save a lot more minerals (and thus labor extracting these minerals) by buying a second-hand phone, or ensuring that your phone gets a good second life by e.g. selling it.
@nebucatnetzer @ambiguous_yelp @GrapheneOS Moreover, what is better for longevity, a phone that gets nearly all updates on day 1 and has an SoC that is fast enough for years to come or a phone that is a security risk from day 1 and had a pretty mediocre SoC even when it was released?
E.g. Fairphone promised at least five years of updates for the Fairphone 4. However, in 2026 it still running a Linux patch release (4.19.197) from 2021.
a53bdbFairPhone is developed and made in China. Most factories there cruelly exploit workers. I don’t think it’s more ethical than Apple, at least you can report the Chinese factories like Foxconn to Apple and it works. And they can’t ship latest Android major releases and security patches, which makes long term support useless.
@a53bdb Fairphone pays their workers a higher wage. But I didnt mention that I was talking about modern slavery in mineral extraction.
@ambiguous_yelp @a53bdb If that's the case, how much are the workers at Fairphone's ODM paid compared to the ones working for Foxconn on iPhones?
Can you provide evidence there's less slavery involved in the supply chain for Fairphone's than iPhones?
Fairphone also uses a lot of standard components. Are you saying they have a more ethical Qualcomm SoC, display and similar components despite them being standard off-the-shelf components? Are those taken into account when comparing to iPhones?
@GrapheneOS @ambiguous_yelp China is a highly corrupt capitalist country, not the so-called socialism or communism. Officials and capitalists jointly exploit the people at the bottom. Without supervision like Apple, they will try their best to continue to exploit workers.
HéliosélèneThere is no absolute privacy on grapheneOS phones. For example using graphene's default browser vanadium, you end up being a lot more uniquely fingerprintable than with a regular android and google chrome.
So this is all a matter of threat model. GrapheneOS is secure, but no device connected to the internet is 100% private, and using grapheneOS stands out a lot more from a metadata standpoint (for now at least).
@helioselene @ambiguous_yelp GrapheneOS goes out of the way to avoid standing out as being GrapheneOS on networks and to services when people are using a VPN. That's why it has a toggle to use the standard connectivity checks. Fixing privacy and security vulnerabilities inherently makes it possible to see those are fixed but that doesn't mean it stands out.
Contrary to your claims, Vanadium has far better protection against fingerprinting than Chrome but doesn't have nearly as many users.
@helioselene @ambiguous_yelp GrapheneOS supports using any Android browser app. There's nothing forcing people to use Vanadium. If you prefer using Brave because it has a significantly larger userbase to blend into than Vanadium along with additional anti-fingerprinting features then you can use Brave instead. It isn't as secure as Vanadium and has privacy disadvantages too. Brave on GrapheneOS is more secure than Brave outside of GrapheneOS due the protections. Same applies to other browsers.
@helioselene @ambiguous_yelp Nearly everyone cares enough about privacy for receiving standard privacy and security patches to be highly important to them even if they don't realize it. The same applies to receiving the standard Android privacy and security protections. Most Android OEMs fail to deliver a bare minimum level of privacy and security. Murena devices are horrible from a basic privacy and security perspective. Dismissing this by claiming it's about threat models is simply nonsense.