I am not a skilled at art, but I had tried to make that a joke...
Dates are a subset of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions_and_claims_for_the_Second_Coming
@ZachWeinersmith
I mean... Which christ? Hippy jesus or uzi jesus?
Bit of a difference, there
@ZachWeinersmith I'm convinced a lot of AI discussions along those lines are less about making real predictions for the future and are more about the speaker trying to convince others that they understand the future
In turn, I think that "I know what's going to happen" attitude can come from a few different places. It could be genuine arrogance, trying to gain influence over others, or a fear of being "left behind"
The second half is what tells you they don't actually believe the first.
It's like a Christian proclaiming the immanent Rapture and investing in their 401k - their actions put the lie to their words.
@ZachWeinersmith I mean, I make food for a living, so unless the superhuman intelligences wipe out everyone who eats food I’m… not expecting my life to fundamentally change?
It’s never been clear to me if the people who make these kind of declarations have any understanding of the food chain beyond “and then my waiter brings it to me”.
Invest in eye drops in preparation for all the eye-rolling everyone will soon be doing.
It kind of sounds like 'write your will and kiss your ass goodbye'.
But first 'gimme money'.
I would prepare by giving the people who say this sort of thing a swirly and then stuff them into a locker.
"I am not in the equally unserious camp that generative AI does not have the potential to drastically change the world. It clearly does. When I saw the early demos of GPT-2, while I was still at university, I was half-convinced that they were faked somehow. I remember being wrong about that, and that is why I'm no longer as confident that I know what's going on.
However, I do have the technical background to understand the core tenets of the technology, and it seems that we are heading in one of three directions.
The first is that we have some sort of intelligence explosion, where AI recursively self-improves itself, and we're all harvested for our constituent atoms because a market algorithm works out that humans can be converted into gloobnar, a novel epoxy which is in great demand amongst the aliens the next galaxy over for fixing their equivalent of coffee machines. It may surprise some readers that I am open to the possibility of this happening, but I have always found the arguments reasonably sound. However, defending the planet is a whole other thing, and I am not even convinced it is possible. In any case, you will be surprised to note that I am not tremendously concerned with the company's bottom line in this scenario, so we won't pay it any more attention."
https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/i-will-fucking-piledrive-you-if-you-mention-ai-again/
@ZachWeinersmith My uneducated take is that they don't really believe in the first part, the push behind AI is a ploy to push down salaries. The second part is because it only really works if everyone colludes with them. If you're not "preparing" by laying off some of your knowledge workers, or worse, are actively scooping up the laid-off folks from other orgs, why that's just terrible for them.
But they can't say that, so they mask it behind a veneer of irresponsible dead-reckoning.
@ZachWeinersmith Structurally? Probably something like "Establish Universal Healthcare and Universal Basic Income" to soften the economkc impact of such a technology.
I want those anyway, but they would be crucial if we managed that level of automation.
We all should move to the woods, and let Elon and Sam build their garbage AI and their trash vision of the future by themselves.
Seeds and spores my dude. It's time to get planting our new home and food supply.